Research Article
SHANK3 Genotype Mediates Speech and Language Phenotypes in a Nonclinical Population
Table 3
Sources of variation for the Bonferroni-adjusted significant results in Table
2.
| Source | SS | Df | F | |
| (a) Magical Thinking | Sex by (CC versus CT versus TT) genotype | Sex | 296.5 | 1 | 23.76 | 0.0000014 | Genotype | 31.2 | 2 | 1.24 | 0.29 | Genotype x sex | 13.4 | 2 | 0.54 | 0.58 | Residuals | 8247.4 | 661 | | |
| (b) Magical Thinking | Sex by (CC + CT) versus TT genotype | Sex | 295.5 | 1 | 23.71 | 0.0000014 | Genotype | 28.9 | 1 | 2.32 | 0.13 | Genotype x sex | 2.1 | 1 | 0.17 | 0.68 | Residuals | 8261.1 | 663 | | |
| (c) Magical Thinking | Sex by (CT + TT) versus CC genotype | Sex | 283.0 | 1 | 22.66 | 0.0000024 | Genotype (CT + TT) versus CC | 0.2 | 1 | 0.01 | 0.91 | Genotype x sex | 11.5 | 1 | 0.92 | 0.34 | Residuals | 8280.3 | 663 | | |
| (d) Odd Speech | Sex by (CC + CT) versus TT genotype | Sex | 81.4 | 1 | 9.20 | 0.0025 | Genotype | 4.4 | 1 | 0.49 | 0.48 | Genotype x sex | 50.7 | 1 | 5.74 | 0.0168 | Residuals | 5861.3 | 663 | | |
|
|