Research Article

Evaluation of Left Atrial Function in Patients with Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation Using Left Atrial Automatic Myocardial Functional Imaging Ultrasonography

Table 2

Comparison of left atrial volume and strain parameters between NVPAF group and normal control group.

LA functionNVPAFControlZ/t

LAVmin44 (22.5∼62)19 (14∼27.5)−5.8950.000
LAVmax64.5 (45∼86)42 (34∼56.75)−4.5060.000
LAVpreA50.5 (34∼71)34 (23.25∼45)−4.6170.000
LAEV20 (15∼26.75)23 (18∼29)−2.0520.057
LAEF35 ± 14.8455.5 (51∼60.75)−6.9240.000
S_R11 (6∼18.75)21 (17∼26.75)−5.3000.000
S_CD−8 (−12∼−3.25)−11 (−15.75∼−8)−3.2730.001
S_CT−4.91 ± 5.35−9.5 ± 5.31−5.0730.000

Data are given as median with 25–75% interquartile range or mean ± standard deviation.  < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. NVPAF, nonvalvular paroxysmal atrial fibrillation; LAVmin, left atrial minimum volume; LAVmax, left atrial maximum volume; LAVpreA, volume at onset of left atrial contraction; LAEV, left atrial evacuation volume; LAEF, left atrial ejection fraction; S_R, left atrial reservoir strain; S_CD, left atrial conduit strain; S_CT, left atrial contractile strain.