Research Article

Are We Overusing Coagulation Studies in the Emergency Department?

Table 1

Clinical and demographic profile of 1,754 patients who were ordered coagulation profile testing.

CharacteristicsN = 1,754

Age in years, mean ± SD42.1 ± 18.5
Gender, n (%)
 Male811 (46.2%)
 Female943 (53.8%)
Chief complaints
 GI related complaints392 (22.3%)
 CNS related/stroke169 (9.6%)
 Trauma121 (6.9%)
 Bleeding and bruising117 (6.7%)
 Dyspnea96 (5.5%)
 Palpitation58 (3.3%)
 Urinary symptoms57 (3.2%)
 Leg pain and swelling54 (3.1%)
 Fever38 (2.2%)
 Back pain31 (1.8%)
 Others
  Toxic ingestion13 (0.7%)
  Psychiatric symptoms5 (0.3%)
 None (sent to do coagulation profile)9 (0.5%)
Comorbidities, n (%)
 None696 (39.7%)
 Diabetes mellitus417 (23.8%)
 Hypertension386 (22.0%)
 Dyslipidemia167 (9.5%)
 Coronary artery disease96 (5.5%)
 Malignancy56 (3.2%)
 End-stage renal disease38 (2.2%)
 Atrial fibrillation29 (1.7%)
 Liver disease29 (1.7%)
 Thromboembolic disease21 (1.2%)
 Ischemic stroke20 (1.1%)
 Hypothyroidism76 (4.3%)
 Others
  Systemic lupus erythematosus8 (0.5%)
  Cardiomyopathy7 (0.4%)
  Hemophilia A3 (0.2%)
  Antiphospholipid syndrome3 (0.2%)
  Carotid stenosis1 (0.1%)
Medications used
 Aspirin173 (9.8%)
 Enoxaparin37 (2.1%)
 Rivaroxaban29 (1.7%)
 Warfarin18 (1.0%)
 Aspirin and clopidogrel13 (0.7%)
 Apixaban10 (0.6%)
 Others
  Heparin and warfarin1 (0.06%)
  Dabigatran1 (0.06%)