Research Article
An ICT-Based Diabetes Management System Tested for Health Care Delivery in the African Context
Table 1
Evaluation of usability, efficiency, and acceptance of Mobil Diab by patients.
| Evaluation of MobilDiab by patients | Subjects (patients) | Q1 (points) | Q2 (points) | Q3 (points) | Q4 (points) | Q5 (points) | Q6 (points) | Q7 (points) | Q11 (points) | Q12 (points) |
| P1 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 10 | 9 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | P2 | 7 | 5 | 8 | 7 | 5 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 7 | P3 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 10 | 5 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | P4 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 6 | 10 | 7 | 10 | 10 | P5 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 6 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 5 | P6 | 10 | 10 | 7 | 8 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | P7 | 8 | 7 | 5 | 6 | 9 | 10 | 7 | 10 | 10 | P8 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 2 | 4 | 10 | 7 | 10 | 10 | P9 | 6 | 5 | 10 | 7 | 8 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 7 | P10 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 10 | P11 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 3 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 6 | P12 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 10 | 8 | 4 | 9 | 7 | P13 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 7 | P14 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 10 | 8 | 10 | 10 | P15 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 10 | 1 | 10 | 10 | P16 | 9 | 10 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | P17 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 7 | 6 | 10 | 5 | 10 | 10 | P18 | 9 | 10 | 7 | 9 | 8 | 10 | 8 | 9 | 10 | P19 | 3 | 5 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 5 | P20 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 4 | 8 | 8 | Sum | 124 | 134 | 143 | 143 | 142 | 173 | 131 | 174 | 172 | Average for each question | 6.2 | 6.7 | 7.15 | 7.15 | 7.1 | 8.65 | 6.55 | 8.7 | 8.6 |
| ā | Usability and design |
Efficiency and therapy satisfaction |
Acceptance and appreciations |
| Average (max. 10 points) | 7 | 7.43 | 8.65 |
|
|