Review Article

Healthcare Practitioners’ Knowledge of Lymphedema

Table 3

Knowledge gaps, other relevant findings, and suggestions.

AuthorGaps in knowledgeOther relevant findingsSuggestions

Noble-Jones et al. [21]Assessment and evaluation, exercise, factors affecting therapy, cultural, ethical and legal concerns(i) Educational needs: compression, surgery, assessment, new advances
(ii) Eager for both online and offline educational materials
(i) Supplemental education on genital lymphedema in addition to current training
(ii) Better collaboration with other specialities

Omar et al., 2021 [22]Lymphatic system, general care, lack of knowledge among other HCPs such as physical therapists(i) Lower experience and competence than knowledge
(ii) Low number of certified practitioners
(iii) Lack of adequate referral system
(iv) 78% eager for professional development opportunities
(i) Self-directed undergraduate educational modules

Dellar et al., 2021 [23]Etiology(i) Unfavorable attitudes, high level of stigma, and lack of skills
(ii) No significant change in attitude
(i) Improved training
(ii) In-service supportive supervision

Churko et al. [24]Etiology, risk factors(i) 56% favorable attitudes
(ii) 59.7% inadequate knowledge and skills
(i) In-service training

Pereira Rios Gerez et al. [25]Proper material in lymphedema management, diagnostic skills, preventive measures(i) Practical knowledge for better practice: lymphatic drainage techniques > therapeutic approach > proper materials > bandaging
(ii) Eager for lymphedema education on: therapeutic approach > wounds > treatment > diagnosis > etiology
(i) Education based on highlighted needs and gaps

Bayisenge et al. [26]Signs and symptoms, at-risk groups(i) Overall positive attitudes
(ii) Gap in practice (wound care and shortage of resources)
(i) Improvement in access to resources
(ii) Educational sessions

Abu Sharour [27]Assessment and examination, follow-up appointment, anatomy, and prevention(i) 93.3% eager for education in-service(i) Educational structured

Tsuchiya et al. [28]Skin care(i) Good knowledge of referral
(ii) 96% eager for education (70% in-service)
(iii) Education needs: prevention, LD, and psychosocial care
(iv) Low intention to community-based education for cancer survivors
(i) Better understanding of cancer survivors needs

Mete Civelek et al. [29]NA(i) Refer BCRL to general surgeon > oncologist > physical medicine > rehabilitation specialist(i) Undergraduate and postgraduate education
(ii) Multidisciplinary approach

Tam et al. [30]Lower knowledge of primary care providers(i) Refer BCRL to physical therapist > surgeon > oncologist(i) Educational interventions especially for PCP

Ryan et al. [31]General function, risk of BP measurement, deep-breathing exercise impact(i) Competence as a predictor for practice
(ii) Beliefs regarding responsibility of nurses: risk reduction (95%), self-management (68%), and treatment (31%)
(i) Education in nursery school curriculum, conferences, journals, and practice setting
(ii) Using National Lymphedema Network and other interest groups
(iii) Multidisciplinary approach

Yakob et al. [32]Etiology, signs and symptoms, stigmata(i) 100% stigmatizing attitudes
(ii) Gap in practice (lack of knowledge and shortage of resources)
(i) Pre- and in-service training
(ii) Improvement in access to resources

Mathews et al. [33]Symptoms, preventable, daily activity difficulties(i) Positive change in attitude(i) Capacities of lymphedema management programs (lymphedema roadshow) for education improvement

Morgan et al. [34]Differential diagnosis (heart failure), lack of clarity of their role, and other professionals(i) Uncertainty of nurses’ role
(ii) Lack of adequate skills
(i) Multidisciplinary approach and communication
(ii) Educational programs

Rath et al. [35]Foot care, massage(i) Gap in practice (foot care)(i) Peripheral care practitioner orientation

Logan et al. [36]Early referral, management of lower limb lymphedema, preventive measures(i) 65.7% eager for education(i) Appropriate education for specialists

NA: not available.