Research Article

Comparative Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety of the Diode Laser (980 nm) and Sclerotherapy in the Treatment of Oral Vascular Malformations

Table 2

Details of comparison between diode laser and sclerotherapy.

Details of site of involvement
Laser groupSTS groupChi sq 2.424
value 0.658NS
Tongue9 (45%)9 (45%)
Buccal mucosa5 (25%)6 (30%)
Lower labial mucosa3 (15%)3 (15%)
Upper labial mucosa1 (5%)2 (10%)
Palate2 (10%)0
Total20 (100%)20 (100%)

Details of size of involvement
Less than  cm8 (40%)7 (35%)Chi sq 0.722
value 0.715NS
 cm- cm6 (30%)4 (20%)
 cm- cm4 (20%)4 (20%)
More than 3.1 cm2 (10%)5 (25%)
Total20(100%)20 (100%)

Details of the number of session
1 session10 (50%)12 (60%)Chi sq 1.143
value 0.565NS
2 session7 (35%)4 (20%)
3 or more than 3 session3 (15%)4 (20%)
Total20 (100%)20 (100%)

Details of the side effects
Pain15 (75%)20 (100%)Chi sq 4.051
value 0.044
Edema020 (100%)
Superficial ulceration20 (100%)20 (100%)
Mild ecchymosis01 (5%)

Details of the VAS scale on 3rd postoperative day
7-10 VAS014 (70%)Chi sq 29.091
value < 0.001
4-6 VAS5 (25%)6 (30%)
1-4 VAS10 (50%)0
0 VAS/no pain5 (25%)0
Total20 (100%)20 (100%)

Response of treatment to individual groups
Complete response16 (80%)18 (90%)Chi sq 0.784
value 0.376NS
Moderate response4 (20%)2 (10%)
No response00
Total20 (100%)20 (100%)

Details of the recurrences
Recurrences5 (25%)1 (5%)
Total20 (100%)20 (100%)