A Modified Iterative Approach for Fixed Point Problem in Hadamard Spaces

<div>Graphical comparison for different algorithms for the sequence <span class="nowrap"><svg height="12.997pt" id="M262" style="vertical-align:-3.2911pt" version="1.1" viewbox="-0.0498162 -9.7059 33.0652 12.997" width="33.0652pt" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,0,0)"><path d="M548 455L523 469C505 448 490 439 461 439C416 439 374 447 316 447C144 447 23 310 23 161C23 47 89 -12 179 -12C312 -12 429 106 429 244C429 303 419 344 368 386L371 388C404 383 440 378 474 378C507 378 530 411 548 455ZM350 274C350 191 308 25 198 25C144 25 108 75 108 157C108 264 170 395 276 395C296 395 320 384 333 360C347 334 350 316 350 274Z"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.0091,0,0,-0.0091,6.76,3.132)"><path d="M781 91L765 118C733 86 702 70 693 70C686 70 685 77 692 106L738 297C772 439 736 451 712 451S675 445 647 431C605 410 526 356 452 257H450L459 294C491 426 459 451 429 451C403 451 386 445 361 431C312 404 239 343 170 253H168L188 333C208 411 205 451 175 451C148 451 85 417 24 346L39 318C57 338 100 374 112 374C120 374 122 372 115 339C91 226 62 112 28 -6L37 -12C59 -4 87 3 114 6C125 68 142 127 154 168C184 227 316 383 372 383C397 383 396 366 381 289C362 192 338 92 312 -6L317 -12C339 -5 367 3 396 6L434 170C468 234 598 383 650 383C668 383 676 369 664 319L609 90C593 23 600 -12 629 -12C654 -12 722 23 781 91Z"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,14.611,0)"><path d="M114 412C81 412 58 388 58 355C58 321 81 297 113 297S169 321 169 355C169 388 145 412 114 412ZM95 130C70 130 46 114 46 88C46 72 54 65 59 64C93 56 121 33 121 -3C121 -41 93 -68 45 -88L56 -118C117 -99 186 -56 186 22C186 91 131 130 95 130Z"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,19.754,0)"><path d="M430 689C430 695 425 700 413 700C377 700 332 667 290 635C232 640 213 677 213 696C213 713 220 724 226 732L209 744C166 731 135 700 135 674C135 636 184 601 255 599C144 503 23 345 23 181C23 82 68 44 135 20C156 12 177 7 202 2C238 -5 252 -25 252 -53C252 -98 211 -144 192 -164L214 -187C257 -152 328 -92 328 -19C328 31 298 58 251 70C230 75 208 81 189 88C142 105 108 134 108 208C108 346 202 512 303 595C352 599 430 626 430 689Z"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.0091,0,0,-0.0091,25.058,3.132)"><path d="M781 91L765 118C733 86 702 70 693 70C686 70 685 77 692 106L738 297C772 439 736 451 712 451S675 445 647 431C605 410 526 356 452 257H450L459 294C491 426 459 451 429 451C403 451 386 445 361 431C312 404 239 343 170 253H168L188 333C208 411 205 451 175 451C148 451 85 417 24 346L39 318C57 338 100 374 112 374C120 374 122 372 115 339C91 226 62 112 28 -6L37 -12C59 -4 87 3 114 6C125 68 142 127 154 168C184 227 316 383 372 383C397 383 396 366 381 289C362 192 338 92 312 -6L317 -12C339 -5 367 3 396 6L434 170C468 234 598 383 650 383C668 383 676 369 664 319L609 90C593 23 600 -12 629 -12C654 -12 722 23 781 91Z"></path></g></svg>.</span></div>

Journal of Function Spaces

fig2

Figure 2

Figure 2: A Modified Iterative Approach for Fixed Point Problem in Hadamard Spaces 