Review Article
CD169 Expression in Lymph Nodes is Associated with Increased Infiltration of CD8+ T Cells in Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Table 2
The number of patients in different CD169 and CD8 expression.
| Study | | Low CD169 (N) | High CD169 (N) | CD169 (IT vs. NT) | HR for OS in high CD169 (95% CI) |
| Kumamoto et al. [19] | Low CD8 | 90/147 | 57/147 | NR | Total GC: 0.41 (0.25–0.69) | High CD8 | 45/147 | 102/147 | Advanced GC: 0.38 (0.22–0.66) |
| Zhang et al. [20] | Low CD8 | 31/38 | 7/38 | FACS (%) 45 ± 10.2 vs. 87.5 ± 5.6 | 0.50 (0.3–0.70) | High CD8 | 2/9 | 7/9 |
| Ohnishi et al. [14] | Low CD8 | 30/42 | 12/42 | NR | 1.29 (0.72–2.39) | High CD8 | 15/41 | 26/41 |
| Takeya et al. [21] | Low CD8 | PT+: 22/29 PT-: 26/48 | PT+: 9/20 PT-: 29/43 | NR | 0.662 (0.297–1.371) | High CD8 | PT+: 7/29 PT-: 22/48 | PT+: 11/20 PT-: 14/43 |
| Li et al. [22] | Low CD8 | HCC: 16/31 GC: 11/24 | HCC: 15/31 GC: 13/24 | IHC (%) HCC 30.4 ± 8.5 vs. 60.9 ± 14.3 | 0.436 (0.27–0.703) | High CD8 | HCC: 1/8 GC: 8/16 | HCC: 7/8 GC: 8/16 | GC 46.3 ± 8 vs. 88.4 ± 3.2 | 0.587 (0.354–0.974) |
| Asano et al. [23] | Low CD8 | 19/25 | 6/25 | NR | 0.13 (0.01–0.76) | High CD8 | 7/19 | 12/19 |
| Ohnishi et al. [15] | Low CD8 | 20/36 | 16/36 | NR | 0.23 (0.06–0.69) | High CD8 | 17/39 | 22/39 |
| Saito et al. [16] | Low CD8 | 17/33 | 16/33 | NR | 0.38 (0.21–0.70) | High CD8 | 10/20 | 10/20 |
| Shiota et al. [24] | Low CD8 | 13/27 | 14/27 | NR | 0.57 (0.11–3.64) | High CD8 | 11/22 | 11/22 |
| Kawaguchi et al. [25] | Low CD8 | 17/31 | 14/31 | NR | 3.009 (1.374–6.692) | High CD8 | 11/58 | 47/58 |
|
|
N: number; OS: overall survival; HR: hazard ratio; GC: gastric cancer; HCC: hepatocellular carcinoma; IT: intro-tumor; NT: nontumor; IHC: immunohistochemistry; FACS: flow cytometry; PT: pretreatment; NR: not reported.
|