Review Article

Lipoproteins as Markers for Monitoring Cancer Progression

Table 2

Summary and characteristics of the clinical studies.

Author/yearCountryStudy designType of lipoproteinSampleType of cancerMain findings

Brantley et al. [33]
Ref 32
USAProspective cohort studyTG, LDL-C, HDL-CCase: 341Colorectal cancerIncrease HDL-C exhibits beneficial effect on recurrence-free survival among statin users.
Serum LDL-C and triglycerides were not associated with colorectal cancer recurrence.
Benn et al. [19]
Ref 18
DenmarkMendelian randomization studyLDL-CCase: 70,179Invasive cancerLDL-C level was associated with an increased cancer risk 43% increase (% to 79% increase).
Bhat et al. [17]
Ref 16
IndiaCase-control studyTC, TG, HDL-C, and LDL-CTotal: 120
Case: 60
Control: 60
Breast cancerLDL-C increased significantly (; ) only in the postmenopausal women than controls but HDL-C remains unchanged.
Crespo-Sanjuan et al. [30]
Ref 28
SpainCase-control studyoxLDL, HDL-CTotal: 142
Case: 128
Control: 14
Colorectal cancerIncrease of oxLDL at the polyp stage in patients without dysplasia indicates relevance of oxLDL as an early risk marker.
Increase of HDL-C in patients shows that HDL-C has protective effect.
Diakowska et al. [14]
Ref 13
PolandCase-control observational studyTC, TG, HDL-C, LDL-CTotal: 108
Case: 73
Control: 35
Colorectal canceroxLDL was significantly higher in early stage of primary tumor than advanced stage tumor.
Hu et al. [15]
Ref 15
ChinaFIESTA observational studyTC, TG, HDL-C, LDL-CCase: 3012Gastric cancerAtherogenic index and LHR are better predictor of gastric cancer mortality in male patients or TNM stages I and II or intestinal type gastric cancer.
Jamnagerwalla et al. [12]
Ref 11
USAREDUCE observational studyTC, HDL-C, LDL-CCase: 4974Prostate cancerHigh total cholesterol and high HDL-C were associated with increased risk of high-grade prostate cancer.
Kumar et al. [21]
Ref 20
IndiaCase-control studyTC, TG, HDL-C, LDL-C, and VLDL-CTotal: 200
Case: 100
Control: 100
Breast cancerLDL-C, TG, and TC were associated with breast cancer (). However, there was no association with different grades of carcinoma. LDL-C, TG, and TC may have some role in aetiology of breast cancer.
Laisupasin et al. [22]
Ref 21
ThailandCase-control studyTC, TG, HDL-C, LDL-C, and VLDL-CTotal: 403
Case: 249
Control: 154
Breast cancerTG, LDL-C, and VLDL-C levels in breast cancer group were significantly increased than normal control group (). HDL-C and TC levels were not associated.
Llanos et al. [18]
Ref 17
USACase-control studyTC, TG, HDL-C, and LDL-CTotal: 199
Case: 97
Control: 102
Breast cancerIncrease of LDL-C was inversely associated with breast cancer risk ( (0.21–0.81)). Low level of HDL-C was associated with significant increase in breast cancer risk ( (1.06–3.74)).
Lofterød et al. [31]
Ref 29
NorwayProspective study
Tromsø study
Total cholesterol
Triglycerides
HDL-C
Case: 464Breast cancerSignificant interaction between triglycerides and TNBC and HDL-C to total cholesterol ratio and TNBC
Strong association between prediagnostic triglycerides and overall mortality and breast cancer-free interval in TNBC patients
5-year overall survival lower in TNBC patients having high triglycerides
HER2 patients with high triglycerides and HDL-C to total cholesterol ratio exhibit inverse association with overall mortality.
Ma et al. [29]
Ref 27
ChinaObservational studyoxLDLCase: 28Gastric cancerConcentration of plasma oxLDL is significantly increased at higher stage of lymph node metastasis.
Mosapour et al. [34]
Ref 31
IranCase-control studyVLDL-CTotal: 105
Case: malignant (50), benign (35)
Control: 20
Breast cancerPositive association between VLDL-C with grade, Ki67, and size of tumor
High level of VLDL-C in premenopausal patients
Nowak et al. [20]
Ref 19
SwedenMendelian randomization studyHDL-C and LDL-C>400,000Breast cancerRaised LDL-C increased the risk of breast cancer ( (1.02–1.18)) and ER-positive breast cancer ( (1.05–1.24)). Raised HDL-C increased the risk of ER-positive breast cancer ( (1.01–1.26)).
Raza et al. [24]
Ref 23
PakistanCase-control studyTC, TG, HDL-C, and LDL-CTotal: 384
Case: 208
Control: 176
Breast cancerIncrease in TC (4%), LDL-C (23%), and TG (11%) was observed from tumor grades I and II, significantly high () compared to control subjects.
Rodrigues dos Santos et al. [25, 26]
Ref 24
PortugalProspectiveTC, TG, HDL-C, and LDL-C244Breast cancerSystemic level of LDL-C was correlated positively with tumor size (Spearman’s , ).
Saito et al. [28]
Ref 26
JapanProspectiveLDL-C16,217Liver cancerLow LDL-C 4.33 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.94, 9.68) was associated with elevated risk of mortality in liver cancer.
Wan et al. [23]
Ref 22
ChinaCase-control studyoxLDL-CTotal: 100
Case: 75
Control: 25
Prostate canceroxLDL-C level was significantly correlated with N stage of prostate cancer.
Xie et al. [27]
Ref 25
ChinaCase-control studyTC, TG, HDL-C, and LDL-CTotal: 1140
Case: 16
Control: 1124
Nasopharyngeal carcinomaTG and TC were independent risk factors in male NPC patients with and , respectively.
Yang et al. [13]
Ref 12
ChinaCase-control studyTC, TG, HDL-C, LDL-C, oxLDL-CTotal: 67
Case: 39
Control: 19
Healthy: 9
LeukemiaoxLDL was significantly higher in patients with leukemia than those without malignancies.
Yuan et al. [32]
Ref 30
ChinaRetrospective studyTC, TG, HDL-C, LDL-C, Apo A, Apo BCase: 99Gallbladder cancerDecrease in HDL-C correlated with poor survival

TC: total cholesterol; TG: triglycerides; HDL-C: high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C: low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; VLDL-C: very low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; oxLDL-C: oxidized low-density lipoprotein cholesterol.