Multiple PAHs’ Detection under CDOM Interference Based on Excitation-Emission Matrix and Interval Selection

Table 3

Prediction results of different methods in the HA-PAH dataset (μg/L).

	Method	RMSEP
FLU	Peak-picking	0.6436	0.9810	0.9865
	FS-PLS	0.5915	0.9924	0.9939
	CSMWPLS	0.5884	0.9980	0.9965
	MC-UVE	0.5739	0.9975	0.9916
	Single-excitation interval PLS	0.5588	0.9974	0.9943
PYR	Peak-picking	2.9173	0.7608	0.8553
	FS-PLS	0.8908	0.9974	0.9887
	CSMWPLS	0.8074	0.9928	0.9917
	MC-UVE	0.7536	0.9969	0.9990
	Single-excitation interval PLS	0.6598	0.9969	0.9911
PHE	Peak-picking	2.8100	0.3122	0.4313
	FS-PLS	1.6104	0.8950	0.9562
	CSMWPLS	1.5048	0.9090	0.9770
	MC-UVE	1.4578	0.8725	0.9350
	Single-excitation interval PLS	1.3502	0.9925	0.9828
BaP	Peak-picking	0.5109	0.9959	0.9921
	FS-PLS	0.4950	0.9992	0.9953
	CSMWPLS	0.4975	0.9992	0.9956
	MC-UVE	0.4765	0.9986	0.9957
	Single-excitation interval PLS	0.4654	0.9991	0.9966

and are the coefficients of determination of the calibration set and test set.