Research Article

Quantitative Analysis of Postural Balance in Faller and Nonfaller Patients with Parkinson’s Disease

Table 2

Comparison of postural balance variables between faller and nonfaller patients.

COP outcome measuresDirectionsFaller
(n = 32, men = 14)
Mean (SD)
Nonfaller
(n = 32, men = 14)
Mean (SD)
Significance
( value)

Mean velocity (mm/s)Overall17.41 (9.45)11.67 (6.12)0.01
AP12.32 (5.94)8.87 (5.40)0.02
ML9.58 (6.95)5.75 (2.66)0.01

Mean distance (mm)Overall7.50 (3.98)5.67 (1.92)0.02
AP4.96 (2.39)4.07 (1.49)0.08
ML4.54 (2.93)3.04 (1.45)0.01

Mean frequency (Hz)Overall0.40 (0.17)0.35 (0.16)0.26
AP0.48 (0.19)0.43 (0.26)0.31
ML0.41 (0.22)0.37 (0.11)0.33

Peak frequency (Hz)Overall0.40 (0.09)0.37 (0.07)0.19
AP0.37 (0.10)0.35 (0.07)0.30
ML0.36 (0.11)0.34 (0.07)0.29

Peak power (mm2/Hz)Overall1031.86 (1130.21)497.42 (347.01)0.01
AP1583.28 (1163.87)747.42 (351.51)P<0.001
ML1907.72 (2322.22)843.40 (1376.53)0.30

Sway area823.23 (1235.08)337.20 (192.06)0.04

Note: COP, center of pressure; SD, standard deviation; AP, anterio–posterior; ML, medio–lateral. Bold values: P < 0.05.