Instrument Study population Reliability Validity Responsiveness Presented in accordance with language version, in alphabetical order (a) sample size (b) gender (% male) (c) mean age (years) (d) pain duration (months) (a) internal consistency (b) reproducibility (c) other (a) content (b) construct (1) convergent (2) divergent (c) criterion related (1) concurrent (2) predictive (d) other (a) Effect size (b) Area under ROC- curve (AUC) (c) other Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ) Chinese Lee et al. [29 , 30 ](a) 476 NP (b) 40% (c) 42.5 (d) no info (a)α FABQ = 0.90 (b) ICC FABQ = 0.81 (c) Item-total FABQ = 0.31–0.68 (a) Content: Translation and back translation + Expert group (b) Construct: PCA: 3 factors (61.6%) (c) Criterion related: Concurrentr s FABQtotal (NRS) entry = 0.34***; discharge = 0.33***; (NPQ) entry = 0.56***; discharge = 0.53***; (SF36 physical) entry = −0.45***; discharge = −0.64***; (SF36 mental) entry = −0.36***; discharge = −0.43*** FABQpa pain related: pain rating = −0.32**; Northwick Park Neck Pain Quest. = −0.39** physical: active range of motion = −0.13**; age = −0.12**; strength index = −0.15**; SF36 physical = −0.47**emotional: SF36: mental = −0.12** FABQwork pain related: pain rating = −0.44**; Northwick Park Neck Pain Quest. = −0.47** physical: age = −0.07**; active range of motion = −0.19**; SF36: physical = −0.40**; strength index = −0.17**psychosocial: SF36: mental = −0.36** FABQprognosis work pain related: Northwick Park Neck Pain Quest. = −0.422**; pain rating = −0.35**physical: age = −0.12**; active range of motion = −0.20**; strength index = −0.17**psychosocial: SF-36: mental = −0.29**; SF-36: physical = −0.49** (a) SRM FABQwork = 0.38 FABQpa = 0.32 (b) — Dutch Crombez et al. [31 ]; Reneman et al. [32 ](a) 35 CP + 38 CLBP; 58 CLBP; (b) 31% + 34%; 67% (c) 36.1+ 40.8; 35.6 and 40.4 (d) 80.4+76; no info (a)α FABQwork = 0.84 FABQpa = 0.57 (b) — (a) — (b) — (c) Criterion related: Concurrent FABQwork (rp ) pain related: baseline pain = 0.56***; disability (RDQ) = 0.63***; experienced pain increase = 0.42**physical: FCE-dynamic forward bend = 0.30*; FCE-lifting performance (men ) = −0.37* peak torque = 0.45**psychosocial: kinesiophobia (TSK) = 0.56*** + 0.53**; negative affect (NEM) = 0.35* + 0.38** FABQpa pain related: base-line pain = 0.31*; disability (RDQ) = 0.51***physical: FCE-static forward bend = 0.30*; peak torque = −0.45**psychosocial: kinesiophobia (TSK) = 0.57***, 0.76***; 0.392; negative affect (NEM) = 0.42** Regression Dependent: Disability (RDQ) β FABQwork = 0.57**; β FABQpa = 0.40* (d) — (a) — (b) — English Waddell et al. [33 ]; McCracken et al. [34 ](a) 184 LBP; 45 CP (b) 55%; 47% (c) 39.7; 46.3 (d) 13.7; 27 (a)α FABQwork = 0.88 FABQpa = 0.77 (b) r p FABQwork = 0.95 FABQpa = 0.88 (c) Other: kappa FABQ = 0.74*** (a) — (b) Construct PCA: 2 factors: FABQwork beliefs (work) and FABQactivity beliefs (pa) (c) Criterion related: Concurrent Rp FABQwork avoidance (PBC) = 0.35**; depressive symptoms (ZDI) = 0.41***; disability (RDQ) = 0.55***; help seeking (PBC) = 0.43**,(PDI) = 0.48** pain severity (VAS) = 0.23**; psych.distress (MSPQ) = 0.36***; work losspresent = 0.39***; work losspast year = 0.55*** FABQpa avoidance (PBC) = 0.46**; depressive symptoms (ZDI) = 0.36***; disability (RDI) = 0.51***; (PDI) = 0.37*; work losspast year = 0.23** FABQtotal avoidance (PBC) = 0.46**; disability (PDI) = 0.52***; help seeking (PBC) = 0.46**Regression (1) Dependent: disability (RDQ); (PDI) ß FABQwork = 0.32***; 0.26**; ß FABQpa = 0.27*** (2) Dependent: work losspast year ß FABQwork = 0.48*** (3) Dependent: help seeking ß FABQwork = 0.43* (d) — (a) — (b) — French Chaory et al. [35 ] (3 studies in 1 article)(a) 31 CLBP; 147 CLBP; 70 CLBP (b) no info; no info; no info (c) 46; 45.3; 42.5 (d) 42.5; 113; 45.5 (a) — (b) ICC FABQwork = 0.88 FABQpa = 0.72 (a) — (b) Construct: Factor Analysis (FA): 4 factors; fear of professional activities, physical activity, beliefs about return to work, beliefs about the responsibility of work with chronic symptoms2 factors ; beliefs about professional activities, beliefs about physical activityConstruct: divergent FABQwork : depression (HADS) = 0.29; disability (Quebec score) = 0.36 FABQpa : handicap (VAS) = 0.36; 0.34 (a) FABQwork = 0.30 FABQwork = 0.31 (b) — German Pfingsten et al., [36 ]; Staerkle et al., [37 , 38 ](a) 302 CLBP; 388 LBP (b) 52%; 44% (c) 44.6; 54.2 (d) 71.4; no info (a)α FABQwork = 0.89 FABQpa = 0.94; 0.91α (after FA) FABQtotal = 0.91; FABQwork1 = 0.89; FABQwork2 = 0.94 FABQpa = 0.69 (b) rp FABQwork = 0.89 FABQwork1 = 0.83; FABQwork2 = 0.89; FABQpa = 0.90; 0.84 (c) Weighted Kappa = 0.76 **ICC FABQwork = 0.91 FABPpa = 0.83 (a) — (b) Construct: Factor Analysis 3 factors : work as a cause (43.4%); prognosis work (11.8%) physical activity (8.9%)2 factors (exclusion item 1, 8, 13, 14): fear-avoidance beliefs relation work-LBP; fear-avoidance beliefs relation physical activity-LBP (c) Criterion related: Concurrent (rp ) FABQwork (baseline) pain related: disability (RDQ) = 0.57***; pain severity (VAS) = 0.47***physical: work absence last month = 0.47***psychosocial: depressive symptoms (ZDI) = 0.42***; psychol. distress (MSPQ) = 0.36*** FABQpa (baseline) pain related: disability (RDQ) = 0.56***; pain severity (VAS) = 0.48***physical: work absence last month = 0.42***psychosocial: depressive symptoms (ZDI) = 0.37***; psychological distress (MSPQ) = 0.31***2 FABQwork (followup) Physical: disability (RDQ) = 0.47***; work absence last month = 0.44***Psychosocial: depressive symptoms (ZDI) = 0.34***; pain severity (VAS) = 0.37*** psychological distress (MSPQ) = 0.29*** FABQpa (followup) pain related: disability (RDQ) = 0.39***; pain severity (VAS) = 0.29***physical: work absence last month = 0.29***psychosocial: depressive symptoms (ZDI) = 0.25***; psychological distress (MSPQ) = 0.24***Regression (1) Dependent: disability (FFbH-R) β FABQwork = 0.35** β FABQpa = 0.22* (2) Dependent: work loss β FABQwork = 0.65*** β FABQpa = 0.12* (d) — (a) Effect size FABQwork = 0.33 FABQpa = 0.41 (b) — Greece Georgoudis et al. [39 ](a) 70 CLBP (b) 17% (c) 42.2 (d) no info (a) α FABQpa = 0.72 FABQwork1 = 0.90 FABQwork2 = 0.86 (b) ICC FABQwork1 = 0.93 FABQwork2 = 0.94 FABQpa = 0.85 (a) — (b) Construct: Convergent FABQwork = TSK = 0.39***; FABQpa = TSK = 0.55***Divergent FABQwork1 : HADS = 0.26*; HADSdepression = 0.35*; HADSanxiety = 0.22*; Pain intensity (VAS) = 0.56 FABQpa = HADSdepression = 0.29*; Pain-intensity (VAS) = 0.49 (a) — (b) — Hebrews Jacob et al. [40 ](a) 151 LBP (b) 44% (c) 44.3 (d) >1 (a) α FABQwork = 0.89 FABQpa = 0.70 (b) ICC FABQwork = 0.90 FABQpa = 0.77Kappa FABQwork = 0.53 FABQpa = 0.64 (a) — (b) — (c) — (a) — (b) — Norwegian Grotle et al. [27 ](a) (123 acute LBP)+ 50 CLBP (b) 45% + 38% (c) 37.8+ 40.4 (d) 0.3 + 18.7 (a) α (n = 28) FABQwork = 0.90 FABQpa = 0.79 (b) ICC FABQwork = 0.82 FABQpa = 0.66 (a) Content: Translation-back translation + Pilot study (b) Construct: Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA): 2 factors (item 8 excluded); FABQwork (60%), FABQpa (54%) FABQwork chronic pain related: disability (ODI) = 0.34*; disability days = 0.52** physical: age = −0.36*; smoking = 0.52**; straight leg raising (SLR) = −0.31*psychosocial: (HSCL25) = 0.43**; (MSPQ) = 0.59**; nonorganic signs = 0.32* FABQpa chronicp pain related: disability (ODI) = 0.39**; disability days = 0.33* physical: smoking = 0.45**; straight leg raising = −0.36*; walking test = 0.31*psychosocial: (MSPQ) = 0.32*; (HSCL25) = 0.36* (c) — (a) SRM (Cohen’s effect size) FABQwork = 0.56 FABQpa = 0.32 (b) — Spanish Kovacs et al. [41 ](a) 209 LBP (b) 42% (c) 45.7 (d) 65 (a) α FABQ = 0.94 (b) ICC FABQ = 0.97 (c) Weighted kappa FABQ = 0.74 (a) — (b) (c) Criterion related: Concurrent FABQwork Disability (RM) = 0.467***; low back pain (VAS) = 0.381***; quality of life (SF-36, PCS) = −0.386***; quality of life (SF-36, MCS) = −0.320**; referred pain (VAS) = 0.323*** FABQpa disability (RM) = 0.412***; low back pain (VAS) = 0.324***; quality of life (SF-36, PCS) = −0-304***; quality of life (SF-36, MCS) = −0.201**; referred pain (VAS) = 0.251*** FABQtotal Disability (RM) = 0.522***; low back pain (VAS) = 0.398***; quality of life (SF-36, PCS) = −0432***; quality of life (SF-36, MCS) = −0.361*; referred pain (VAS) = 0.320*** (a) — (b) — (c) Floor and ceiling effects FABQwork Floor effect 2.9% Ceiling effect 8.6% FABQpa Floor effect 1.4% Ceiling effect 23.9% FABQtotal Floor effect 1.0% Ceiling effect 3.3% Fear Avoidance of Pain Scale (FAPS) English Crowley and Kendall [42 ](a) 21 + 63 chronic musculoskeletal pain (b) 33% (c) 35.7 (d) 48.8 (a)α 0.92 (b) rp 0.84** (
𝑁
=
2
1
) (a) — (b) — (c) Criterion related: Concurrent depression (Zung) = 0.48** −0.54**; disability (FLP) = 0.42** −0.69**; impact of pain (MPI) = −0.04* −0.73**; pain (VAS) = 0.37** −0.48**; pain-related thoughts (PRSS-CAT) = 0.51** −0.63** (a) — (b) — (c) Sensitivity to treatment Change ANOVA Pretreatment versus post-treatment 14.85* Pre-treatment versus followup 22.4* Fear of Pain Questionnaire (FPQ) English Hursey and Jacks [43 ]; McCracken et al. [34 ]; McNeil and Rainwater [44 ], [45 ](a) 45 headache and 58 controls,45 CP; 40 CP and 40 healthy controls +275 students (b) 12%; 47%; 32.5% (c) 462; 474 (d) 272; no info (a) α Headache: FPQTotal scale = 0.92 FPQMinor = 0.86 FPQSevere , FPQMedical = 0.87 Controls: FPQTotal scale = 0.80 FPQMinor = 0.71 FPQSevere = 0.86 PQMedical = 0.64 (b) — (a) — (b) — (c) Criterion related: Concurrent FPQtotal disability (PDI) = 0.15; somatic = 0.38*** anger = 0.13; anxiety = 0.0.37***; avoidance (PBC) = 0.25; complaints (PBC) = 0.22; depression = 0.46***; help seeking (PBC) = 0.11; pain (MPQ) = 0.03 FPQSevere Complaints (PBC) = 0.32** (d) Intercorrelations subscales rα Minor-medical = 0.30***; Severe-medical = 0.65***Group effect for: Severe pain < 0.024; Gender effect: Subscales and total scale
𝑃
<
0
.
0
1
, Ethnical effect in control group, Medical pain
𝑃
<
0
.
0
5
(a) — (b) — Pain Anxiety Symptoms Scale ( PASS) Dutch Crombez et al. [30 ](a) 31 CLBP (b) 48% (c) 41.61 (d) 121 (a) α PASS = 0.91 (b) — (a) — (b) — (c) Criterion related: Concurrent validity catastrophizing (PCS) = 0.61***; kinesiophobia (TSK) = 0.34*; negative affect (NEM) = 0.63***; weight lifting (s) = −0.33* (a) — (b) — Combined Dutch and USA study Roelofs et al. [46 ] Dutch/The Netherlands English/USA Original PASS + PASS-20(a) 398 FMS (Dutch)+ 2. 228 CLBP (Dutch) + 3. 284 pain (USA) (b) 6% + 39% + 35% (c) 47.6 + 50.0 + 46.6 (d) 159 + 2. 74 + 63 (a) α PASStotal = 0.94 PASScognitive anxiety = 0.85 PASSfear of pain = 0.86 PASSescape/avoidance = 0.75 PASSphys.s of anxiety = 0.86 PASS-20 = 0.91 PASScognitive anxiety = 0.84 PASSfear of pain = 0.84 PASSescape/avoidance = 0.73 PASSphysiological symptoms of anxiety = 0.74 (b) — (a) — (b) Construct validity: Convergent validity PASStotal : catastrophizing (PCS) = 0.76; fear (TSK) = 0.55, PVAQ = 0.59 PASScognitive anxiety : catastrophizing = 0.69; fear (TSK) = 0.45; PVAQ = 0.52 PASSfear of pain : catastrophizing = 0.73; fear (TSK) = 0.54; PVAQn = 0.51 PASSescape/avoidance : catastrophizing = 0.58; fear (TSK) = 0.49; PVAQ = 0.55 PASSphysiological symptoms of anxiety : catastrophizing (PCS) = 0.76; fear (TSK) = 0.41; PVAQ = 0.42 PASS-20cognitive anxiety : catastrophizing (PCS) = 0.70; fear (TSK) = 0.44; PVAQ = 0.54 PASS-20fear of pain : catastrophizing (PCS) = 0.74, fear (TSK) = 0.53; PVAQ = 0.53 PASS-20escape/avoidance ; catastrophizing (PCS) = 0.54; fear (TSK) = 0.47; PVAQ = 0.50 PASSphysiological symptoms of anxiety : catastrophizing (PCS) = 0.56; fear (TSK) = 0.37; PVAQ = 0.40 (c) — (a) — (b) — English 53 items McCracken et al., [18 ]; [34 ]; Burns et al., [47 ]; Strahl et al. [48 ](a) 104 CP; 45 CP; 98 CP; 154 RA (b) 46%; 47%; 100%; 14% (c) 45; 46.3; 38.9; 54 (d) 63.; 27; 9.5; 178 (a) α PASStotal = 0.941 PASSsomatic = 0.891 PASScognitive = 0.871 PASSfear = 0.851 PASSescape/avoidance = 0.811 (b) — (a) — (b) — (c) Criterion related: Concurrent validity rp PASStotal pain related: disability (PDI) = 0.45***; 0.61***; pain interference (IS) = 0.22**subjective pain (McGill)sensory = 0.31***; (McGill)affective = 0.44***; (MPI)pain severity = 0.32***; pain experience (MPQ)pain = 0.56***; pain severity (PSS) = 0.31***; subjective pain (MPI)interference = 0.39***physical: carrying capacity (CCE) = −0.30**; general activity (GAS) = −0.23**; lifting capacity (PILE) = −0.30**; tranquilizer = 0.29**psychosocial: anxiety (STAI)trait = 0.60***; 0.54***; coping (CSQ)catstrophising = 0.73***; depression (BDI) = 0.57***; 0.52***; pain behaviour (PBC)avoidance e = 0.45**; pain behaviour (PBC)helpseeking = 0.32*; symptoms of anxiety (CSAQ)cognitive = 0.54***; symptoms of anxiety (CSAQ)somatic = 0.61*** PASSsomatic pain related: disability (PDI) = 0.39***; 0.51***; pain experience (MPQ)pain = 0.63***subjective pain (McGill)sensory = 0.45***; (McGill)affective = 0.51***; (MPI)pain severity = 0.35***; (MPI)interference = 0.28**physical: tranquilizer = 0.25**psychosocial: anxiety (STAI)trait = 0.52***; coping (CSQ)catstrophising = 0.67***; depression (BDI) = 0.51***; symptoms of anxiety (CSAQ)cognitive = 0.49***; (CSAQ)somatic = 0.74*** (a) — (b) — PASScognitive pain related: disability (PDI) = 0.39***; 0.51***; pain experience (MPQ)pain = 0.43**; subjective pain (McGill)affective = 0.33***; (McGill)sensory = 0.26**; subjective pain (MPI)interference = 0.25**; (MPI)pain severity = 0.35***Physical: tranquilizer = 0.27**Psychosocial: anxiety (STAI)trait = 0.67***; coping (CSQ)catstrophising = 0.67***; depression (BDI) = 0.67***; pain behaviour (PBC)avoidance = 0.33*; symptoms of anxiety(CSAQ)cognitive = 0.61***; (CSAQ)somatic = 0.55*** PASSfear pain related: disability (PDI) = 0.30***; 0.38**; pain experience (MPQ)pain = 0.44**; subjective pain (McGill)affective = 0.36***; (MPI)interference = 0.31***; (MPI)pain severity = 0.28**psychosocial: anxiety (STAI)trait = 0.53***; depression (BDI) = 0.50***1 ; coping (CSQ)catstrophising = 0.66***; pain behaviour (PBC)avoidance = 0.39**; (PBC)complaints = 0.39**; symptoms of anxiety (CSAQ)cognitive = 0.53***; (CSAQ)somatic = 0.56*** PASSescape/avoidance pain related: disability (PDI) = 0.30***; subjective pain (McGill)affective = 0.31***; (MPI)interference = 0.36*** Psychosocial: anxiety (STAI)trait = 0.29**; coping (CSQ)catstrophising = 0.42***; depression (BDI) = 0.30*** (d) Prediction: Regression (1) Dependent: Interference1: β PASStotal (+STAI-T) = 0.28*; 0.087*; (+MPQ-sensory) = 0.39***; (+Pain severity) = 0.28**; (+PSS) = 0.254***; (+BDI) = 0.254*** (2) Dependent: Disability: β PASStotal (+BDI) = 0.32*; (+STAI-T) = 0.38**; (+MPQ-sensory) = 0.44***; (+Pain severity) = 0.32*** (3) Dependent: General activity: β PASS (+STAI) = 0.087*; (+BDI) = 0.057*; (+PSS) = 0.054* (4) Dependent: Pain severity (MPQ); β (PASSphysiological ) = 0.63*** (5) Dependent: Disability (PDI); β PASSescape/avoidance) = 0.44** (6) Dependent: Avoidance (PBC); β PASSescape/avoidance = 0.54*** (7) Dependent: Complaints (PBC); β PASSfear = 0.39** (8) Dependent: Help seeking (PBC); β PASSescape/avoidance = 0.30 English or French 20 items Coons et al. [49 ](a) 201 current pain (b) 45% (c) 41.5 (d) 23 (a) α PASS = 0.83 PASSfear of pain = 0.83 PASSescape/avoidance = 0.70 PASS physiological symptoms of anxiety = 0.76 PASScognitive anxiety = 0.85 (b) — (a) — (b) Construct validity: Effect size PASS20fear pain related: disability (MPI) = 0.32**; pain severity (MPI) = 0.28**physical: physiological (ASI) = 0.35**psychosocial: cognitive (ASI) = 0.37**; public (ASI) = 0.31** Affect (AIMS2) = 0.43*; pain sx (AIMS2) = 0.22*; Social (AIMS2) = 0.33*; Symptoms (ASE) = −0.38*; pain (ASE) = −0.45*; negative affect (MPI) = 0.44**; perceived control (MPI) = −0.34**; social support (MPI) = 0.18**; Passive coping = 0.73*; Active coping = −0.44* PASS20escape pain related disability (MPI) = 0.36**; pain severity (MPI) = 0.16*; pain (ASE) = −0.30*; symptoms (ASE) = −0.29*physical physiological (ASI) = 0.23**psychosocial Affect (AIMS2) = 0.26*; Role (AIMS2) = 0.20*; Social (AIMS2) = 0.24*; cognitive (ASI) = 0.28**; public (ASI) = 0.26**; negative affect (MPI) = 0.22**; social support (MPI) = 0.19**; Active coping = −0.39*; Passive coping = 0.67* PASS20physiological pain related disability (MPI) = 0.27**; pain (ASE) = −0.35*; pain severity (MPI) = 0.15*; perceived control (MPI) = −0.23**; symptoms (ASE) = −0.29*physical physiological (ASI) = 0.33**psychosocial affect (AIMS2) = 0.51*; pain sx (AIMS2) = 0.25*; role (AIMS2) = 0.29*; social (AIMS2) = 0.31*; cognitive (ASI) = 0.34**; public (ASI) = 0.26**; Active coping = −0.28*; Passive coping = 0.61*; negative affect (MPI) = 0.44** PASS20cognitive pain related Disability (MPI) = 0.25**; Pain (ASE) = −0.42*; pain severity (MPI) = 0.20** Symptoms (ASE) = −0.32*Physical Physiological (ASI) = 0.32**psychosocial affect (AIMS2) = −0.42*; cognitive (ASI) = 0.31**; public (ASI) = 0.25**; negative affect (MPI) = 0.39**; perceived control (MPI) = −0.30**; Active coping = −0.33*Passive coping = 0.69*; social (AIMS2) = 0.30*Regression (1) Dependent: Affect; PASS and STAI = 0.332*** (2) Dependent: Role function; PASS and STAI = 0.315** (d) — (a) Effect size rp 0.68*** (b) — English Larsen et al. [28 ](a) 259 CP (b) 58% (c) 38.2 (d) 21 (a) — (b) — (a) — (b) Construct validity: EFA (PCA) 5-factor solution (44%): catastrophic thought; physiological anxiety; escape/avoidance; cognitive interference; coping strategies rp PASScatastrophic thoughts pain related: pain (MPQ)affective scale = 0.23**psychosocial: anxiety (STAI) = 0.49**; depression (BDI) = 0.40** PASSphysiological anxiety pain related: pain (MPQ)present pain index = 0.29** physical: analgesic use = −0.18* psychosocial: anxiety (STAI) = 0.35**; depression (BDI) = 0.35**; pain (MPQ)affective scale = 0.33**; (MPQ)pain intensity = 0.30**; (MPQ)sensory scale = 0.36**; pain-related change in lifestyle = 0.17*; pain-related distress = 0.22** PASSescape/avoidance pain related: Pain (MPQ)present pain index = 0.25**; (MPQ)pain intensity = 0.24** physical: analgesic use = −0.25** psychosocial: anxiety (STAI) = 0.30**; depression (BDI) = 0.19**; pain-related change in lifestyle = 0.38**; pain-related distress = 0.25** PASScognitive interference pain related: pain (MPQ)present pain index = 0.35** physical: analgesic use = −0.33** psychosocial: anxiety (STAI) = 0.50**; depression (BDI) = 0.38**; pain-related change in lifestyle = 0.25**; pain-related distress = 0.21**; pain (MPQ)affective scale = 0.17**(MPQ)pain intensity = 0.22** PASScoping strategies physical: analgesic use = −0.27**psychosocial: anxiety (STAI) = 0.33**; depression (BDI) = 0.20** (a) — (b) — Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK) Dutch 12 items Vlaeyen et al. [50 ](a) 129 + 33 CLBP (b) 39% + 48% (c) 40.1 + 37.4 (d) 119 + 91 (a) α TSK17 = 0.77 (17 items) TSK13 = 0.53–0.73 (13 items) (b) — (c) Item total <.40 (a) — (b) Construct validity: PCA: 4 factors (36.2%): harm, fear of (re)injury, importance of exercise, avoidance of activity (c) Criterion-related validity: Concurrent validity: TSKtotal : catastrophising (PCS) = 0.54***; fear of blood, injury (FSS) = 0.32** pain impact (PCL-e) = 0.27**; pain intensity (MPQ) = 0.21** TSKharm : catastrophising (PCS) = 0.47***; fear of blood, injury (FSS) = 0.32**; pain impact (PCL-e) = 0.23**; pain intensity (MPQ) = 0.24** TSKfear : catastrophising (PCS) = 0.52***, fear of blood, injury (FSS) = 0.37**; pain impact (PCL-e) = 0.38***; pain intensity (MPQ) = 0.25** TSKAvoidance of activity : catastrophising (PCS) = 0.35***Regression: Prediction Dependent: Disability: β TSKtotal = 0.44* (d) — (a) — (b) — Dutch 13 items Goubert et al. [51 ](a) 277 CLBP+FMS (b) 33.6% (c) 41.33 (d) 97.9 + 116.4 (a) α (1) TSKtotal CLBP = 0.80; FMS = 0.82 (2) TSKactivity avoidance CLBP = 0.73; FMS = 0.76 (3) TSKpathologic somatic focus CLBP = 0.70; FMS = 0.70 (b) — (a) — (b) Construct validity: CFA: 2 factors: activity avoidance; pathological somatic focus (c) — (a) — (b) — Dutch 11 items Roelofs et al. [52 ](a) 1109 UED + 2825 CP (b) 33% + no info (c) 41.7 + no info (d) no info (a) α UED TSK11 = 0.77 Chronic pain TSK11 = 0.75–0.80 (b) — (a) — (b) Construct validity: CFA: 2 factors (11 items): Somatic focus, Activity avoidance (c) Criterion related: Concurrent TSKSF pain related: functioning (DASH) = 0.23**; pain intensity = 0.24** physical: sports (DASH) = 0.18**; work (DASH) = 0.31** TSKAA pain related: functioning (DASH) = 0.32**; pain duration = 0.14**; pain intensity = 0.19**physical: sports (DASH) = 0.25**; work (DASH) = 0.27**Regression: Predictive (1) Dependent: Disability: β TSKAA = 0.13*** (2) Dependent: Disability, work: β TSKSF = 0.16***: β TSKAA = 0.06* (3) Dependent: Disability, sports: β TSKAA = 0.18*** (d) — (a) — (b) — English 4 items Burwinkle et al. [53 ](a) 233 FMS (b) 0% (c) 43.79 (d) 122.4 (a) α TSK4 = 0.71 (b) — (a) — (b) Construct validity: PCA: 1 factor (54.2%) (c) — (a) — (b) — English 11 items Woby et al. [54 ](a) 111 + 104 CLBP (b) no info (c) 43.4 + 44.4 (d) 79.2+80.4 (a) α TSKtotal = 0.76 TSK11 = 0.79 (b) ICC TSK = 0.82 (c) SEM = 3.16 item-total <.20 (4, 8, 9, 12, 14, 16) (a) — (b) Construct validity: Correlations between change scores TSKtotal : Disability (RDQ) = 0.50***; Pain (VAS) = 0.22* TSK11 : Disability (RDQ) = 0.51***; Pain (VAS) = 0.27** (c) Criterion related: Predictive Regression Dependent: change in disability; β TSKtotal = 0.39; β TSK11 = 0.38 (d) — (a) SRM TSKtotal = −1.19; TSK11 = −1.11 (b) AUC TSKtotal = 0.70; TSK11 = 0.71 (c) Sensitivity TSKtotal = 71%; TSK11 = 66%Specificity TSKtotal = 63%; TSK11 = 67% TSKtotal = 4 pts; TSK11 = 4 pts English 13 items Clark et al. [55 ]; French et al. [56 ](a) 167 veterans; 200 CBP + NP (b) 100%; 46% (c) 47.6; 40.0 (d) 180; 16.7 (a) α TSKtotal = 0.86; 0.84 TSKtaa = 0.78 TSKtsf = 0.70 (b) — (c) Item-total = 0.29–0.69 (a) — (b) Construct validity (EFA): 2 factors : activity avoidance, pathological somatic focus3 factors (c) Criterion-related validity: concurrent pain related: disability (Quebec) = 0.30**; pain interference (MVAS) = 0.39**; pain intensity (VAS) = 0.23**Psychosocial: anxiety (STAI) = 0.28**; catastrophising (PCS) = 0.53**; depression (BDI) = 0.34**; FABQpa = 0.35**; FABQwork = 0.34**Regression (1) Dependent: Pain interference (MVAS); β (TSK) = 0.29*** (2) Dependent: Disability (Quebec); β (TSK) = 0.22*** (d) — (a) — (b) — Norwegian Damsgård et al. [57 ](a)120 patients: 48 LBP, 72 WP (b)LBP: 42% women, 58% men WP: 58% women, 42% men (c)mean age 42 (SD 10) (d) — (a) — (b) Reproducibility: Pearson separation reliability = 0.87 (a) — (b) Mean item fit = 0.26 (SD 0.86); Mean person fit = −0.17 (SD 1.15) Targeting: Item distribution −3.2 to 3.2 Pearsons location mean = −0.21 (SD 1.12) Invariance: Item 10 varied for gender Analysis of residual pattern: Unidimensional underlying construct according to binomial test CI for probability 0.05 to 0.13 (c) — (a) — (b) — Swedish 17 items Lundberg et al. [7 ]; Bunketorp et al. [58 ](a) 102 CLBP; 46 WAD (b) 49% (c) 45.3 (d) 66; 1.5–3 (a) α TSK = 0.81 (b) ICC = 0.91 rp = 0.91*** RP = −0.01, CI = (−0.12; 0.14) RC = −0.08, CI = (−0.25; 0.09) RV = 0.21, CI = (0.04; 0.38) Kappa = 0.0 (c) Item-total <.40 (a) Content validity: Pilot study, Translation, back translation (b) Construct validity: PCA: 5 factors (59%) + known group technique (c) — (a) — (b) —