The Malaria Burden: A South African Perspective

Balmith, Marissa; Basson, Charlise; Brand, Sarel J.

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/6619010

Journal of Tropical Medicine

On this page

Abstract Introduction Conclusion Data Availability Conflicts of Interest Authors’ Contributions Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2024 | Article ID 6619010 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/6619010

The Malaria Burden: A South African Perspective

Marissa Balmith,¹Charlise Basson,²and Sarel J. Brand³

Academic Editor: Jianbing Mu

Received22 Nov 2023

Revised30 Jan 2024

Accepted14 Feb 2024

Published23 Feb 2024

Abstract

Malaria is a deadly disease caused by protozoan pathogens of the Plasmodium parasite. Transmission to humans occurs through the bite of an infected female Anopheles mosquito. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), an estimated 247 million cases of malaria were recorded worldwide in 2021, with approximately 619 000 malaria deaths. The initial signs of malaria can be mild and challenging to diagnose due to the signs and symptoms being similar to those of other illnesses. The malaria burden remains largely concentrated in the WHO sub-Saharan African region and has been recognised as a significant contributor to morbidity and mortality. This review aims to contribute to the existing knowledge on malaria in South Africa, a region within sub-Saharan Africa, focusing on the epidemiology and life cycle of the malaria parasite as well as diagnostic approaches for detecting malaria. In addition, nonpharmacological and pharmacological interventions for treating and preventing malaria infections will also be discussed herein. While there has been a significant reduction in the global burden of this disease, malaria remains a public health issue in South Africa. As such, the implementation of effective preventative measures and strategies, early diagnosis, and appropriate treatment regimens are crucial to reducing the malaria burden in South Africa.

1. Introduction

Malaria is a life-threatening infectious disease and is considered one of the leading contributors to the ongoing global health crisis. Malaria, which is caused by the Plasmodium parasite, is a mosquito-borne disease that spreads from person to person through the bite of an infected female Anopheles mosquito [1]. In 2021, approximately half of the global population was at risk for malaria, with the World Health Organization (WHO) African region accounting for 95% of the global malaria burden [2]. In addition, malaria was responsible for approximately 80% of deaths in children under the age of five on the WHO African continent [2]. It is important to note that while there are several different species of the Plasmodium parasite, only five are known to cause malaria in humans, namely, Plasmodium falciparum (P. falciparum), Plasmodium vivax (P. vivax), Plasmodium malariae (P. malariae), Plasmodium ovale (P. ovale), and Plasmodium knowlesi (P. knowlesi) [3]. Of these, P. falciparum is the most common in humans [2], with African countries, including South Africa, bearing the burden of P. falciparum infections [4], due to factors such as high transmission rates and socioeconomic challenges [5] that limit their access to healthcare services [3, 6]. Of note, P. falciparum is widely considered to be the most virulent and potentially fatal if not promptly diagnosed and treated [7–9]. As such, this review will focus on the malaria burden in South Africa, a country located in the southernmost part of the African continent in sub-Saharan Africa, which has been stricken by at least two major outbreaks in the last two decades, resulting in numerous people succumbing to the disease [10]. By providing an in-depth understanding of the malaria burden in South Africa, this review aims to contribute to the ongoing global efforts in the fight against this devastating disease.

2. Epidemiology of Malaria in South Africa

The transmission of malaria is closely linked to specific ecological conditions [11]. In South Africa, malaria infections are almost exclusively caused by P. falciparum and remain endemic to the northeastern parts of the country in certain South African provinces, including Limpopo, KwaZulu-Natal, and Mpumalanga (Figure 1) [12], especially during the humid and rainy months of summer [12, 14].

(a)

(b)

3. Malaria Statistics in South Africa

Over the past decades, South Africa has shown consistent improvement in reducing both the morbidity and mortality rates associated with malaria [15]. For many years, annual malaria cases in South Africa were maintained below 10,000 due to vector control and case management efforts, with approximately 8750 reported cases in 1995 [12]. However, beginning in 1996, the effectiveness of insecticides and treatments decreased, leading to a sharp increase in malaria cases and deaths that peaked in 2000 [12]. During this period, malaria cases rose by 67% in 1996 and reached over 60 000 in 2000, resulting in more than 400 deaths [12]. The decline in efficacy of sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine might have contributed to the significant increase in mortality [12].

In 2000, when the first-line malaria drug sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine failed in South Africa, they reintroduced dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT) for traditional structures while maintaining pyrethroids for modernised housing, using a mosaic strategy for resistance management [16, 17]. Artemisinin-containing combination treatment (ACT) was also introduced for malaria treatment [17, 18]. Despite global pressure against insecticide use, South Africa decided to bring back DDT to control the malaria epidemic [17, 19]. Following the adoption of regional malaria control strategies in South Africa, Swaziland, and Mozambique, the implementation of ACTs and the introduction of an effective insecticide, national case numbers decreased to 26 506 in 2001 [12]. In 2007, South Africa reported fewer than 6000 malaria cases and subsequently started internal discussions on malaria elimination based on WHO recommendations [20, 21]. These statistics continued to fall to below 10 000 by 2011 [12]. In 2012, South Africa formally adopted an elimination strategy aiming to stop local malaria transmission within the country’s borders by 2018 [20, 22]. South Africa has achieved an 87% reduction in malaria cases, with a decline from 64,622 cases in 2000 [17] to 8,126 cases in 2020 [15]. Furthermore, the number of malaria-related deaths has decreased by 91% (459 deaths in 2000 to 38 deaths in 2020) [15].

4. Factors Influencing the Transmission of Malaria in South Africa

4.1. Vector

The predominant vector for malaria in South Africa is the Anopheles mosquito [23], which uses stagnant water sources like ponds, puddles, and irrigated fields to create the ideal breeding ground [24, 25]. Given the variations in breeding preferences among Anopheles mosquitoes, their prevalence and distribution are influenced by numerous factors such as rainfall patterns, temperature, soil characteristics, vegetation cover [26], and human activities (e.g., deforestation and migration) [27]. Areas with higher vector populations are at a greater risk of malaria transmission, especially when combined with other factors such as the presence of infected individuals and inadequate protective measures [24]. While infection with P. falciparum continues to be the primary cause of malaria infections in South Africa, effective control measures have aided in successfully suppressing malaria infection rates until the early 1980s [12]. As a result, South Africa established a monitoring system aimed at assessing the in vitro effectiveness of first-line treatments and gaining insights into the impact of drug resistance on the ever-changing malaria trends [12]. In South Africa, efforts to control malaria focus on targeting these vectors with the use of measures like (i) indoor residual spraying (IRS), which involves applying an insecticide to the walls and surfaces of a house where the insecticide remains active for several months, effectively eliminating mosquitoes that come into contact with the treated areas [28], (ii) the distribution of insecticide-treated bed nets (ITNs) which creates a protective barrier against mosquitoes and aids in repelling and eliminating mosquitoes [29], and (iii) larviciding by destroying larval habitats [30]. These measures aim to reduce vector populations, limit human-mosquito contact, and disrupt the cycle of transmission.

4.2. Environmental Factors

Climatic factors heavily influence the distribution of malaria, such as high temperatures, humidity, and rainfall [31]. Malaria occurs predominantly in tropical and subtropical areas where the Anopheles mosquito can survive and reproduce, allowing the malaria parasite to complete its life cycle in the mosquito [32]. Elevated temperatures have been known to lead to the production of smaller and fecund mosquitoes [33]. As temperatures rises, the maturation period for mosquitoes decreases, while their feeding frequency increases [24]. Thus, temperature is crucial, as P. falciparum is unable to complete its growth cycle in the Anopheles mosquito at cooler temperatures below 20°C and as a result, cannot be transmitted [34]. Transmission is favourable in warmer regions, with the highest transmission found in sub-Saharan Africa (Figure 1) [11, 34]. In South Africa, malaria transmission increases around the month of October, reaching a peak during the months of January and February, followed by a decline in May [35]. Notably, South Africa’s climate plays a significant role in shaping the malaria statistics in the country.

4.3. Human Behaviour

Human behaviour is also known to play a significant role in the transmission of malaria. Individuals living in malaria-endemic regions are often more exposed to mosquito bites due to various factors, including sleeping outdoors, going outdoors at night [36], inadequate utilisation of mosquito nets, or limited access to protective or preventative measures [37]. Furthermore, population movement and travel, such as migration, tourism, and labour migration to malaria-endemic areas, can introduce or spread malaria parasites to previously unaffected regions [38, 39]. It is also important to consider the impact of human behaviour on the transmission of malaria in South Africa. During the peak transmission period, human behaviour and practices, such as travel [40, 41], outdoor activities (such as farming) [42], and the use of protective measures [43], play a crucial role in the spread of malaria [40]. In addition, compliance with protective measures, such as the use of insecticide-treated nets and antimalarial medication, can also influence the dynamics of malaria transmission [44]. In addition, cultural practices and community perceptions in South Africa are also known to influence the spread of malaria [45]. As such, it is important to consider targeted interventions and preventive measures to help mitigate malaria transmission. Access to malaria diagnostic services in South Africa during the peak transmission period is particularly crucial for disease management. Healthcare facilities need to be well-equipped with diagnostic technologies and services. However, the South African healthcare system grapples with resource constraints, overburdened facilities, and a high burden of infectious diseases, such as human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) and other noncommunicable diseases, placing additional pressure on an already strained healthcare system [46, 47].

4.4. Socioeconomic Factors and Vulnerable Populations

Socioeconomic conditions also influence malaria transmission in South Africa. These include a lack of education [5], limited access to healthcare and diagnostic services [48], inadequate housing facilities, and poverty [5]. A delay in diagnosis and treatment often leads to the progression of infection and further transmission within the community [49, 50]. Socioeconomic factors majorly influence vulnerable populations, with children under the age of 5 in the sub-Saharan Africa region accounting for two-thirds of these deaths [51]. It is estimated that 1% of children infected with P. falciparum will develop cerebral malaria [52]. Furthermore, it is well known that HIV increases an individual’s susceptibility to malaria [53] and that South Africa is among the many countries predominantly affected by the global HIV burden [54]. Pregnant women are among the most vulnerable, and pregnancy-associated malaria may lead to severe malaria, cerebral malaria, anaemia, premature birth, abortions, low birthweight babies, congenital malaria, and a higher risk of coinfections [55]. From the authors’ perspective, in a developing country like South Africa, people living in poverty or with poor access to healthcare may also be more likely to contract malaria due to factors such as inadequate housing, water, sanitation, hygiene, and limited access to effective antimalarial treatments.

4.5. Malaria Life Cycle

The life cycle of the malaria parasite is complex and involves two hosts, namely, human (Figures 2(a) and 2(b)) and vector (mosquito) (Figure 2(c)). A malaria-infected female Anopheles mosquito injects sporozoites into the human host during a blood meal. Sporozoites enter the liver and infect liver cells (hepatocytes) [6, 56]. Sporozoites then mature into schizonts and rupture, releasing merozoites [6, 56]. Following replication in the liver, in a process known as exoerythrocytic schizogony (Figure 2(a)), the parasites undergo asexual multiplication in the erythrocytes (erythrocytic schizogony) (Figure 2(b)) [6, 56]. Merozoites infect and infiltrate RBCs (erythrocytes) [6, 56] (Figure 2). The ring-stage trophozoites proliferate into mature trophozoites, which then mature into schizonts. The latter rupture and release merozoites, which infect erythrocytes [6, 56]. Some infected blood cells break the asexual multiplication cycle. Instead of replicating, the merozoites in these cells mature into gametocytes, which circulate in the bloodstream as sexual forms of the parasite [6, 56]. When a mosquito bites an infected person, the gametocytes are ingested. The parasites’ multiplication in the mosquito is known as the sporogonic cycle [6, 56] (Figure 2(c)). While in the mosquito’s stomach, the microgametes penetrate the macrogametes, generating zygotes [6, 56]. Zygotes become motile and elongated (ookinetes) that burrow through the mosquito’s midgut wall and form oocysts on the outside surface [6, 56]. As the oocyst bursts, sporozoites are released into the body cavity and travel to the mosquito’s salivary glands [6, 56]. When a mosquito bites another individual, the human infection cycle starts over again [6, 56] (Figure 2). The life cycle allows the malaria parasite to spread between the mosquito and human, making it difficult to control and eliminate the disease. The clinical signs and symptoms of malaria can vary depending on the stage of the malaria parasite’s life cycle and the severity of the infection.

4.6. Clinical Signs and Symptoms of Malaria

Initial symptoms of malaria are nonspecific and similar to those of minor systemic viral illnesses (Table 1) making it difficult to diagnose malaria in its early stages, particularly in areas where the disease is common and other illnesses with similar symptoms are prevalent [58].

Classical symptoms are recurrent 6–10 hour attack cycles with three distinct stages, namely, a cold stage (rigors) [59], a hot stage (fever up to 40 degrees Celsius (°C)) [59], accompanied by headaches, vomiting, joint pain, and seizures in young children, and a perspiration stage (sweating, regaining thermal control, and fatigue) [59].

4.7. Guidelines for Malaria Diagnosis

Diagnosing malaria can be challenging due to an overlap in signs and symptoms that are also common to other diseases such as viral infections and enteric fever [60]. A delay in the diagnosis and treatment of malaria is the leading cause of malaria deaths [60]. Malaria must be diagnosed promptly to prevent complications from developing. A rapid and effective malaria diagnosis is essential to ease suffering and decrease community transmission [61]. According to WHO guidelines, malaria must be diagnosed with a parasitological test, including light microscopy or immunochromatographic rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs), of which the results must be available [62]. Despite microscopy being historically regarded as the gold standard for diagnosing malaria [63], it is not without its limitations, which include its detection threshold and a lack of infrastructure and skilled personnel in South African laboratories [64]. The use of RDTs somewhat addresses these drawbacks, particularly the logistical difficulties. As a result, both microscopy and RDTs are used in South Africa to diagnose malaria under the National Malaria Diagnostic and Treatment Guidelines [57]. There are several ways to detect and diagnose malaria; however, only a few will be discussed in this review. A clinical assessment (Table 1) is usually performed, followed by a parasitological lab test to confirm the diagnosis.

4.8. Microscopic Blood Assay

Conventionally, malaria has been diagnosed through the microscopic examination of Giemsa-stained peripheral blood smears [61, 65]. Parasitic infection is confirmed through thick blood films, whereas species are confirmed through thin blood films [61]. With 100% specificity, microscopic examination remains the gold standard for the diagnosis of malaria [52]. Further advantages of this method are that it is quick, inexpensive, and provides both quantitative (parasite density, with a threshold of 50–500 parasites per microliter (μL)) and qualitative (Plasmodium species) data, which allow for the diagnosis of the stage of malaria infection [66, 67].

4.9. Rapid Diagnostic Tests

New and cost-effective malaria diagnostic procedures have been identified and developed, namely, the rapid diagnostic test (RDT), which has a specificity of 90% or higher and provides results [68] within 5–20 minutes [69]. The RDT works by detecting a malarial antigen in an individual’s blood passing through a membrane that contains specific antimalaria antibodies [70]. This method allows for the identification and detection of plasmodial proteins, specifically histidine-rich protein 2 (HRP-2) and parasite-specific aldolase or parasite-specific lactate dehydrogenase (pLDH) [61]. To perform RDT, a blood specimen acquired from the patient is applied, along with certain reagents, to a sample pad on the test card [71, 72]. The presence of specific bands in the test-card window following a short incubation period indicates whether the patient is infected with P. falciparum or one of the other species of human malaria [72]. For P. falciparum histidine-rich protein 2 (PfHRP-2), this method has a detection threshold of 2.6–14.6 nanogram (ng) per millilitre (mL) [52].

Of note, deletion of the histidine-rich protein 2 and 3 (HRP-2/3) genes in P. falciparum can have significant implications with respect to the diagnosis of malaria. These deletions can lead to the reduced sensitivity of RDT, thus impacting its ability to accurately detect P. falciparum infections [73]. For example, false negative results could mean that those individuals that are infected with P. falciparum could go undetected and subsequently untreated, leading to the underestimation of malaria cases [74]. It is also important to consider that the prevalence of HRP-2/3 deletions may vary across regions, necessitating tailored diagnostic approaches [73, 75]. In addition, HRP-2/3 deletions could pose a threat to malaria control programmes [76]. These deletions highlight the need to explore alternative diagnostic approaches to increase the reliability of results in regions where these deletions are widespread. Another drawback to RDTs is that the majority of these tests can only detect one malaria species, which is P. falciparum, P. vivax, human Plasmodium species, or a combination of species [75]. Furthermore, this method cannot differentiate between past and present infections and is unable to quantify parasite density [52].

4.10. Quantitative Buffy Coat

The quantitative buffy coat (QBC) technique was designed to simplify and enhance the microscopic detection of parasites in peripheral blood and to improve malaria diagnosis [61]. This highly sensitive method is based on microcentrifugation and involves utilising fluorescent dyes, such as acridine orange, to stain parasite deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) in specialised capillary tubes with a plastic float [77]. The components of the buffy coat segregate according to their densities during centrifugation, generating distinctive bands [78]. Separation and metachromatic labelling of these cells are aided by reagents that cover the QBC test tube [78, 79]. Thereafter, fluorescent microscopy can be used to detect malaria in infected cells and plasma [78].

4.11. Immunofluorescence Antibody Testing

Malaria can also be diagnosed using serological methods, which rely on the identification of antibodies against asexual blood-stage malaria parasites [80]. With a specificity of 90–95% and a detection threshold of 100 parasites per μL [52], immunofluorescence antibody (IFA) testing is a time-consuming yet extremely sensitive method for diagnosing malaria [61]. The principle of IFA is that specific antibodies are produced within two weeks of infection with any Plasmodium species and remain for 3–6 months after the parasite has been cleared [61]. IFA testing uses a unique antigen produced on a slide, coated, and stored at −30°C before use [61]. In addition, immunoglobulin G (IgG) and immunoglobulin M (IgM) antibodies are quantified in serum samples collected from patients [61]. Despite its usefulness as a species-specific test, this method cannot differentiate between past and present infections [52].

4.12. Polymerase Chain Reaction

Molecular diagnostic methods, including the polymerase chain reaction (PCR), have been employed in the molecular diagnosis of malaria, allowing for the precise detection of Plasmodium sp. DNA from peripheral blood [81]. It has a specificity of nearly 100% and high sensitivity, requiring only 1–5 parasites per μL for malaria detection [52]. Compared to QBC and RDT methods, the PCR approach was found to be more sensitive and is now widely used to confirm malaria infection, follow-up therapeutic response, and identify drug resistance [61]. A further advantage is that, in cases with very low parasitaemia, PCR may be more sensitive than traditional microscopy and can distinguish between different species [52].

4.13. Prevention of Malaria Infection

A combination of pharmacological and nonpharmacological measures is used to prevent malaria in travellers [82]. While pharmacological prophylaxis is extremely vital, nonpharmacological strategies for preventing malaria are just as important; however, they are only meant to supplement existing therapies and should not be used in place of antimalarial drug prophylaxis [37]. It may be beneficial to wear insecticide-treated nets or light-coloured clothing with long sleeves and long trousers [37]. Compared to routinely treated bed nets, long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) and repellents are anticipated to have a longer period of activity [37]. Other forms of protection include avoiding going outside after dusk [83]. Malaria control interventions such as IRS with insecticides and the use of ITNs are known to impact malaria transmission [84]. Insecticides commonly used for LLINs are pyrethroids, and for IRS, they include pyrethroids, carbamates, organophosphates, and DDT [85]. However, emerging vector resistance to these insecticides threatens recent progress in malaria control [85]. Adequate implementation and coverage of these interventions can significantly reduce mosquito populations and the risk of malaria transmission [37]. High-risk patients, including pregnant women, children under the age of five, elderly persons, and immunocompromised persons should avoid exposure to malaria [14]. In addition, people should avoid visiting malaria-endemic countries during the dry season [14].

4.14. Treatment of Malaria

Over time, the emergence and spread of drug-resistant malaria parasites, such as P. falciparum, have posed significant challenges to malaria control efforts, making malaria drugs less effective in the fight against the disease [86]. This has subsequently led to treatment failures and increased transmission, especially in infected individuals who are not appropriately treated [87, 88]. Addressing drug resistance is crucial to the success of malaria control programmes or interventions, especially in malaria-endemic areas. The steady increase in malarial deaths may be partially attributed to the rise in resistance to sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine, a staple in the treatment and prophylaxis of malaria at the time [89]. The development of resistance has become a major obstacle to the efficient treatment of malaria, particularly malaria caused by P. falciparum [90]. Despite advances in understanding the molecular mechanisms of resistance, factors that promote the development and transmission of these resistant parasites remain unclear [91]. Ultimately, resistance led to the introduction of ACT and regional malaria control strategies in parts of Southern Africa [12]. While the signs and symptoms associated with P. falciparum infection usually begin between 7 and 21 days subsequent to exposure, longer incubation periods may be observed in patients who failed chemoprophylaxis or received antibiotic therapy during this period [57]. In addition, fewer than half of the travellers who contract malaria pursue pretravel consultation [92]. Individuals who are at risk for malaria include those who do not take the necessary precautions when travelling [83].

As alluded to earlier, Plasmodium sp. has a complicated life cycle, and most approved drug treatments target the blood stages by (i) inhibiting haem crystallisation, (ii) acting as antifolates, or (iii) producing free radicals [93]. The inhibitors of haem crystallisation include chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine, as well as amine alcohol derivatives of the same 4-aminoquinoline ring-containing molecule, i.e., lumefantrine, quinine, and mefloquine [93]. All these compounds lead to the accumulation of toxic-free haem in the parasite by preventing its metabolism subsequent to the breakdown of haemoglobin [80, 94]. Antifolates, on the other hand, prevent the production of essential amino acids in the parasite by competing with para-aminobenzoic acid (PABA) for incorporation into folate by inhibiting the dihydropteroate synthase (DHPS; class I antifolates) enzyme or by inhibiting dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR; class II antifolates). The former includes sulphadoxine and dapsone, and the latter includes proguanil and pyrimethamine. However, due to the parasite’s ability to scavenge folate from its host, these drugs have limited efficacy when used as monotherapy, and the use of the DHPS inhibitors has largely been negated due to resistance and its propensity for inducing toxicity in individuals [93, 95]. While artemisinin is associated with poor bioavailability, both artemether and artesunate were derived to improve artemisinin’s pharmacokinetic properties. Free radicals produced by these compounds induce oxidative stress, which causes damage to proteins and other macromolecular structures within the parasite [80], and ACT therefore remains an important therapeutic option for uncomplicated malaria [8]. Another well-known chemoprophylactic, doxycycline, a tetracycline antibiotic, has been shown to act as a schizonticide during the human blood stage of infection by interfering with protein and pyrimidine biosynthesis. It offers effective chemoprophylaxis against P. falciparum even in regions that commonly experience drug resistance, and while being effective in the treatment of acute infection, doxycycline should not be used as monotherapy and is therefore commonly combined with other antimalarials, i.e., quinine or artesunate, for this purpose [93, 96].

The three most prominently prescribed drugs available in South Africa for malaria prophylaxis include doxycycline, atovaquone/proguanil, and mefloquine. While appropriateness is based on the patient profile (Table 2), a combination of atovaquone and proguanil is recommended due to its shorter course of treatment and low incidence of adverse effects. Furthermore, both this combination and doxycycline are available as a pharmacist-advised therapy [99]. Patient compliance and adequate dosing are essential when taking any of these options, as noncompliance results in a significant increase in the failure of chemoprophylaxis [100].

Considering that the majority of malaria cases in South Africa result from P. falciparum infections, the treatment guidelines (Tables 3 and 4) are aimed at this species [50, 88].

4.15. Antimalarial Drug Resistance

P. falciparum has developed resistance to all currently used antimalarial drugs, rendering the use of chloroquine and sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine either alone or in combination ineffective [102]. Resistance to sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine is linked to mutations in the dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) and dihydropteroate synthase (DHPS) genes, whereas resistance to chloroquine is linked to mutations in the P. falciparum chloroquine-resistance transporter (pfcrt) and P. falciparum multidrug resistance 1 (pfmdr1) genes [53]. In an attempt to overcome P. falciparum-induced resistance, combination treatment has been implemented in several countries including South Africa and is now the preferred approach to treating malaria [103, 104]. The rationale behind combination treatments is to inhibit the spread of parasites resistant to one component of the combination by adding another component with a different mechanism of action. Importantly, the combination will preferably include drugs with similar half-lives so that resistance cannot be acquired when the parasite is exposed to only one drug, with a shorter half-life than the other, for prolonged periods [53]. Advances in uncomplicated falciparum malaria treatment include the replacement of chloroquine and sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine with an alternative to chloroquine, namely, ACTs, which are now recommended as first-line treatments, including in pregnancy [102].

Currently used combinations of antimalarial drugs include nonartemisinin combinations, such as quinine and sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine, quinine and doxycycline, sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine and chloroquine, and sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine and amodiaquine, as well as artemisinin-based combinations, such as artemether-lumefantrine, artesunate and amodiaquine, dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine, artesunate and mefloquine, and artesunate and sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine [53]. While P. ovale, P. malariae, and P. knowlesi are still considered to be generally chloroquine-sensitive, patients should be treated with artemether-lumefantrine if infected with P. vivax or in regions known to experience chloroquine resistance. If doubt exists about the offending species, standard treatment guidelines for P. falciparum infection should be followed. In the case of oral treatment, first doses should be administered under supervision and the patient should be observed for at least an hour due to the common occurrence of vomiting in patients suffering from malaria. Paracetamol is the antipyretic agent of choice due to the increased risk of renal complications with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in malaria [57]. A recent report by the WHO emphasised the emergence of artemisinin resistance in Africa, which remains a growing concern. However, strategies are currently being put in place to help minimise resistance in countries like South Africa [88].

4.16. Novel Antimalarials in Development

As a result of acquired resistance to most of the current malaria treatments and subsequent limited treatment options, the modification of existing treatments as well as the design of novel treatments has emerged (Table 5).

In South Africa, malaria treatment is generally effective, particularly with the use of ACTs [57]. However, the efficacy of treatment can be compromised in cases of drug-resistant strains of the malaria parasite [87]. In terms of affordability, malaria treatment in sub-Saharan Africa poses a significant obstacle [107]. South Africa provides free malaria diagnosis and treatment through its public healthcare system [108]. However, access to healthcare can be limited in certain rural or remote areas, and private healthcare can be expensive for those who cannot afford it [109].

4.17. Malaria Vaccine

In October 2021, the WHO recommended the use of the RTS, S/AS01 (RTS, S) malaria vaccine among children living in sub-Saharan Africa and regions with moderate to high P. falciparum malaria transmission [110]. This was based on outcomes from a clinical trial conducted in Ghana, Kenya, and Malawi in approximately 900,000 children [110]. The RTS, S vaccine is considered a pre-erythrocytic vaccination because it specifically targets the circumsporozoite protein (PfCSP) on the surface of the sporozoite and P. falciparum parasites prior to invading and infecting hepatocytes [111]. The vaccine was created as a virus-like particle (VLP) containing two parts, namely, 18 copies of the central repeat and the C-terminal domain of PfCSP fused to a hepatitis B virus surface antigen [112]. RTS, S/AS01 is the only vaccine that has shown protective efficacy against clinical malaria in a phase III clinical study, albeit protection is very partial, diminishes over time, and might depend on age [112].

4.18. Malaria Control and Prevention Programmes

Most children who die from malaria do so because they do not seek treatment promptly. In response, the WHO has suggested implementing Community Case Management of Malaria (CCMm), previously known as home-based management of malaria [113]. This strategy aims to reduce the malaria burden by enhancing early access to malaria-directed healthcare through trained community-based providers like community health extension workers, coordinators, and private vendors. CCMm ensures that effective anti-malarial drugs and referral guidelines are accessible at the community level [113]. The Southern African Malaria Control (SAMC) programme has implemented a systematic and standardised approach to tackle malaria epidemics in the region since 1998 [114]. This comprehensive strategy involves strategic planning, forecasting, prevention, preparedness, and early warning mechanisms to enable a more effective and timely response [114]. Several SAMC countries utilise residual house spraying and insecticide-treated net distribution for preventing epidemics, while residual house spraying is mainly employed as an early response measure to mitigate the impact of outbreaks [114]. Vector control is an essential element of the global malaria control strategy (GMCS) and is widely acknowledged as the most effective approach to preventing malaria transmission [115]. Nevertheless, Ediau et al. reported that inadequate knowledge and negative attitudes toward IRS are prevalent, particularly among individuals living in rural areas with lower education levels [116]. WHO/AFRO (Regional Office for Africa) is promoting the Integrated Disease Surveillance and Response (IDSR) programme, which helps epidemiologists choose and utilise precise indicators, initially on a monthly basis [114]. In districts prone to epidemics, a second step involves gathering weekly malaria morbidity and mortality data to swiftly detect any abnormal rise within two weeks and take prompt action [114]. The programme has great potential to enhance early epidemic detection for malaria and other diseases, and its implementation is advancing effectively across the continent [114].

5. Conclusion

Despite South Africa having made significant progress in the control, prevention, and treatment of malaria, this disease continues to pose a serious public health threat. Since 2000, the prevalence of malaria has decreased as a result of significant advancements. However, the issue of drug resistance as well as malaria importation from neighbouring countries still poses a threat. Various chemoprophylactic and treatment approaches are still considered highly effective, albeit subject to patient compliance. With that being said, malaria is preventable and curable if diagnosed and treated early. The Malaria Control Programme in South Africa aims to implement malaria control interventions or measures to help significantly reduce the incidence of malaria in the country. However, despite ongoing efforts to treat malaria and eliminate emerging strains of multidrug resistance, the eradication of malaria remains a challenge in current global efforts to minimise the impact and spread of the disease.

Data Availability

No underlying data were collected or produced in this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Authors’ Contributions

MB, CB, and SJB drafted the article, conducted the literature research, collected the data, analysed and interpreted the results, and wrote the manuscript. The authors were also responsible for conceptual contributions, reviewing, and editing the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Prof. Christine Feak from the Department of English Language Institute, University of Michigan, for reviewing the manuscript.

References

J. Talapko, I. Škrlec, T. Alebić, M. Jukić, and A. Včev, “Malaria: the past and the present,” Microorganisms, vol. 7, no. 6, p. 179, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
World Health Organization, “Malaria,” 2022, https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/malaria.
View at: Google Scholar
A. O. Badmos, A. J. Alaran, Y. A. Adebisi et al., “What sub-Saharan African countries can learn from malaria elimination in China,” Tropical Medicine and Health, vol. 49, no. 1, p. 86, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
World Health Organization, “Guidelines for the treatment of malaria,” 2015, https://www.afro.who.int/publications/guidelines-treatment-malaria-third-edition.
View at: Google Scholar
A. Degarege, K. Fennie, D. Degarege, S. Chennupati, and P. Madhivanan, “Improving socioeconomic status may reduce the burden of malaria in sub Saharan Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” PLoS One, vol. 14, no. 1, Article ID e0211205, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, “Malaria,” 2020, https://www.cdc.gov/about/index.html.
View at: Google Scholar
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, “Malaria,” 2023, https://www.cdc.gov/about/index.html.
View at: Google Scholar
M. A. Phillips, J. N. Burrows, C. Manyando, R. H. van Huijsduijnen, W. C. Van Voorhis, and T. N. C. Wells, “Malaria,” Nature Reviews Disease Primers, vol. 3, no. 1, Article ID 17050, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Zekar and T. Sharman, “Plasmodium falciparum malaria,” 2023, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32310422/.
View at: Google Scholar
J. Njau, S. P. Silal, A. Kollipara et al., “Investment case for malaria elimination in South Africa: a financing model for resource mobilization to accelerate regional malaria elimination,” Malaria Journal, vol. 20, no. 1, p. 344, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. J. Ryan, C. A. Lippi, and F. Zermoglio, “Shifting transmission risk for malaria in Africa with climate change: a framework for planning and intervention,” Malaria Journal, vol. 19, no. 1, p. 170, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Maharaj, J. Raman, N. Morris et al., “Epidemiology of malaria in South Africa: from control to elimination,” South African Medical Journal, vol. 103, no. 10, pp. 779–783, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Mapchart, “Mapchart,” 2022, https://www.mapchart.net/africa.html.
View at: Google Scholar
National Department of Health, “Guidelines for the prevention of malaria,” 2018, http://www.nicd.ac.za/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/National-Guidelines-for-prevention-of-Malaria_updated-08012019-1.pdf.
View at: Google Scholar
Xinhua, “Africa reduced malaria deaths by over 91 pct in past 20 years: gov't,” 2021, http://www.xinhuanet.com/english/africa/2021-04/23/c_139901749.html.
View at: Google Scholar
G. Munhenga, S. V. Oliver, L. N. Lobb et al., “Malaria risk and receptivity: continuing development of insecticide resistance in the major malaria vector Anopheles arabiensis in northern KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa,” South African Journal of Science, vol. 118, no. 3/4, pp. 1–7, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Coetzee, P. Kruger, R. H. Hunt, D. N. Durrheim, J. Urbach, and C. F. Hansford, “Malaria in South Africa: 110 years of learning to control the disease,” South African Medical Journal, vol. 103, no. 10, pp. 770–778, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Blumberg and J. Frean, “Malaria control in South Africa challenges and successes,” South African Medical Journal, vol. 97, no. 11, pp. 1193–1197, 2007.
View at: Google Scholar
S. Sadasivaiah, Y. Tozan, and J. G. Breman, “Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT) for indoor residual spraying in africa: how can it be used for malaria control?” in Defining and Defeating the Intolerable Burden of Malaria III: Progress and Perspectives: Supplement to Volume 77(6) of American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, J. G. Breman, M. S. Alilio, and N. J. White, Eds., American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, Northbrook, IL, USA, 2007.
View at: Google Scholar
J. Raman, N. Morris, J. Frean et al., “Reviewing South Africa's malaria elimination strategy (2012-2018): progress, challenges and priorities,” Malaria Journal, vol. 15, no. 1, p. 438, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
National Department of Health, National Malaria Statistics, National Department of Health Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa, 2013.
National Department of Health, Malaria Elimination Strategy for South Africa 2012–2018, National Department of Health Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa, 2012.
Y. Dahan, W. Sekgele, A. Matamba et al., Malaria Vector Surveillance Report, South Africa, National Department of Health Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa, 2020.
Y. Dahan, E. Jamesboy, L. Lobb et al., Malaria Vector Surveillance Report, South Africa, National Department of Health Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa, 2019.
M. C. Castro, “Malaria transmission and prospects for malaria eradication: the role of the environment,” Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med, vol. 7, no. 10, Article ID a025601, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, “Larval control and other vector control interventions,” 2020, https://www.cdc.gov/malaria/malaria_worldwide/reduction/vector_control.html.
View at: Google Scholar
L. Pascoe, T. Clemen, K. Bradshaw, and D. Nyambo, “Review of importance of weather and environmental variables in agent-based arbovirus models,” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol. 19, no. 23, Article ID 15578, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. A. Afrane, A. K. Githeko, and G. Yan, “The ecology of Anopheles mosquitoes under climate change: case studies from the effects of deforestation in East African highlands,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 1249, no. 1, pp. 204–210, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J.-A. A. Tangena, C. M. J. Hendriks, M. Devine et al., “Indoor residual spraying for malaria control in sub-Saharan Africa 1997 to 2017: an adjusted retrospective analysis,” Malaria Journal, vol. 19, no. 1, p. 150, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Unicef, “Fighting malaria with long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs),” 2022, https://www.unicef.org/supply/stories/fighting-malaria-long-lasting-insecticidal-nets-llins.
View at: Google Scholar
F. Fouque and J. C. Reeder, “Impact of past and on-going changes on climate and weather on vector-borne diseases transmission: a look at the evidence,” Infect Dis Poverty, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 51, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Venugopal, F. Hentzschel, G. Valkiūnas, and M. Marti, “Plasmodium asexual growth and sexual development in the haematopoietic niche of the host,” Nature Reviews Microbiology, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 177–189, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. F. Ezeakacha and D. A. Yee, “The role of temperature in affecting carry-over effects and larval competition in the globally invasive mosquito Aedes albopictus,” Parasites & Vectors, vol. 12, no. 1, p. 123, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, “Where malaria occurs,” 2020, https://www.cdc.gov/cdc-info/index.html.
View at: Google Scholar
National Department of Health, “Malaria,” 2023, https://www.cdc.gov/cdc-info/index.html.
View at: Google Scholar
A. Monroe, O. Asamoah, Y. Lam et al., “Outdoor-sleeping and other night-time activities in northern Ghana: implications for residual transmission and malaria prevention,” Malaria Journal, vol. 14, no. 1, p. 35, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. M. Croft, “Malaria: prevention in travellers (non-drug interventions),” BMJ Clinical Evidence, vol. 2014, p. 0903, 2014.
View at: Google Scholar
L. B. Hartjes, “Preventing and detecting malaria infections,” The Nurse Practitioner, vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 45–53, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Steverding, “The spreading of parasites by human migratory activities,” Virulence, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1177–1191, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
KwaZulu, “KwaZulu natal province health,” 2023, https://www.kznhealth.gov.za/malariainfo.htm.
View at: Google Scholar
B. D. Brooke, “Malaria vector surveillance and control in an elimination setting in South Africa,” Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease, vol. 7, no. 11, p. 391, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. E. Nkya, U. Fillinger, O. P. Sangoro, R. Marubu, E. Chanda, and C. M. Mutero, “Six decades of malaria vector control in southern Africa: a review of the entomological evidence-base,” Malaria Journal, vol. 21, no. 1, p. 279, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Moonasar, N. Morris, I. Kleinschmidt et al., “What will move malaria control to elimination in South Africa?” South African Medical Journal, vol. 103, no. 10, pp. 801–806, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. D. Nothdurft and K. C. Kain, “Chapter 6 malaria prevention,” in The Travel and Tropical Medicine Manual, C. A. Sanford, P. S. Pottinger, and E. C. Jong, Eds., pp. 71–90, Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 2017.
View at: Google Scholar
M. Munzhedzi, E. T. Rogawski McQuade, J. L. Guler et al., “Community knowledge, attitudes and practices towards malaria in Ha-Lambani, Limpopo Province, South Africa: a cross-sectional household survey,” Malaria Journal, vol. 20, no. 1, p. 188, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Malakoane, J. C. Heunis, P. Chikobvu, N. G. Kigozi, and W. H. Kruger, “Public health system challenges in the Free State, South Africa: a situation appraisal to inform health system strengthening,” BMC Health Services Research, vol. 20, no. 1, p. 58, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. T. Maphumulo and B. R. Bhengu, “Challenges of quality improvement in the healthcare of South Africa post-apartheid: a critical review,” Curationis, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. e1–e9, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Kizito, M. Kayendeke, C. Nabirye, S. G. Staedke, and C. I. Chandler, “Improving access to health care for malaria in Africa: a review of literature on what attracts patients,” Malaria Journal, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 55, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Mousa, A. Al-Taiar, N. M. Anstey et al., “The impact of delayed treatment of uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria on progression to severe malaria: a systematic review and a pooled multicentre individual-patient meta-analysis,” PLoS Medicine, vol. 17, no. 10, Article ID e1003359, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. M. Crutcher and S. L. Hoffman, “Malaria,” in Medical Microbiology, S. Baron, Ed., University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, TX, USA, 1996.
View at: Google Scholar
J. O. Sarfo, M. Amoadu, P. Y. Kordorwu et al., “Malaria amongst children under five in sub-Saharan Africa: a scoping review of prevalence, risk factors and preventive interventions,” European Journal of Medical Research, vol. 28, no. 1, p. 80, 2023.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Marino, D. A. Bivona, and P. Bonacci, “Updates in central nervous system malaria: literature review and considerations,” Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 255–261, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. M. Greenwood, K. Bojang, C. J. Whitty, and G. A. Targett, The Lancet, vol. 365, no. 9469, pp. 1487–1498, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site
K. Zuma, L. Simbayi, N. Zungu et al., “The HIV epidemic in South Africa: key findings from 2017 national population-based survey,” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol. 19, no. 13, p. 8125, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. C. Restrepo-Posada, J. Carmona-Fonseca, and J. A. Cardona-Arias, “Systematic review of microeconomic analysis of pregnancy-associated malaria,” Heliyon, vol. 6, no. 7, Article ID e04558, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Nureye and S. Assefa, “Old and recent advances in life cycle, pathogenesis, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of malaria including perspectives in Ethiopia,” The Scientific World Journal, vol. 2020, Article ID 1295381, 18 pages, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
National Department of Health, “Guidelines for the treatment of malaria in South Africa,” 2019, https://health.gov.za/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/national-guidelines-for-the-treatment-of-malaria-south-africa-2019.pdf.
View at: Google Scholar
Y. P. Bria, C.-H. Yeh, and S. Bedingfield, “Significant symptoms and nonsymptom-related factors for malaria diagnosis in endemic regions of Indonesia,” International Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 103, pp. 194–200, 2021.
View at: Google Scholar
A. Bartoloni and L. Zammarchi, “Clinical aspects of uncomplicated and severe malaria,” Mediterranean Journal of Hematology and Infectious Diseases, vol. 4, no. 1, Article ID e2012110, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. K. Chaturvedi, R. C. Bajpai, and P. Tiwari, “Determination of cut-off and correlates of delay in treatment-seeking of febrile illness: a retrospective analysis,” BMC Public Health, vol. 20, no. 1, p. 572, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Tangpukdee, C. Duangdee, P. Wilairatana, and S. Krudsood, “Malaria diagnosis: a brief review,” Korean Journal of Parasitology, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 93–102, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
World Health Organization, “WHO guidelines for malaria,” 2022, https://files.magicapp.org/guideline/dd9bc55e-175c-460d-9cf2-b023f19a31b5/published_guideline_5701-3_0.pdf.
View at: Google Scholar
O. O. Oyegoke, L. Maharaj, O. P. Akoniyon et al., “Malaria diagnostic methods with the elimination goal in view,” Parasitology Research, vol. 121, no. 7, pp. 1867–1885, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
National Department of Health, “National malaria diagnosis quality assurance guidelines,” 2011, https://www.who.int/westernpacific.
View at: Google Scholar
B. A. Mathison and B. S. Pritt, “Update on malaria diagnostics and test utilization,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 55, no. 7, pp. 2009–2017, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Opoku Afriyie, T. K. Addison, Y. Gebre et al., “Accuracy of diagnosis among clinical malaria patients: comparing microscopy, RDT and a highly sensitive quantitative PCR looking at the implications for submicroscopic infections,” Malaria Journal, vol. 22, no. 1, p. 76, 2023.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
World Health Organization, “Malaria microscopy quality assurance manual,” 2016, https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/documents/publications/gmp/malaria-microscopy-quality-assurance-manual.pdf.
View at: Google Scholar
E. Rogier, K. E. S. Hamre, V. Joseph et al., “Conventional and high-sensitivity malaria rapid diagnostic test performance in 2 transmission settings: Haiti 2017,” The Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 221, no. 5, pp. 786–795, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Nosten and N. J. White, “Artemisinin-based combination treatment of falciparum malaria,” The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, vol. 77, no. 6_Suppl, pp. 181–192, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Moody, “Rapid diagnostic tests for malaria parasites,” Clinical Microbiology Reviews, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 66–78, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. S. Kakkilaya, “Rapid diagnosis of malaria,” Laboratory Medicine, vol. 34, no. 8, pp. 602–608, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, “Rapid diagnostic tests: how they work,” 2018, https://www.cdc.gov/malaria/malaria_worldwide/reduction/dx_rdt.html.
View at: Google Scholar
C. M. Leonard, A. Assefa, J. N. McCaffery et al., “Investigation of Plasmodium falciparum pfhrp2 and pfhrp3 gene deletions and performance of a rapid diagnostic test for identifying asymptomatic malaria infection in northern Ethiopia,” Malaria Journal, vol. 21, no. 1, p. 70, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
O. J. Watson, K. M. Sumner, M. Janko et al., “False-negative malaria rapid diagnostic test results and their impact on community-based malaria surveys in sub-Saharan Africa,” BMJ Global Health, vol. 4, no. 4, Article ID e001582, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. L. Gatton, R. R. Rees-Channer, J. Glenn et al., “Pan-Plasmodium band sensitivity for Plasmodium falciparum detection in combination malaria rapid diagnostic tests and implications for clinical management,” Malaria Journal, vol. 14, p. 115, 2015.
View at: Google Scholar
D. Okanda, L. Ndwiga, V. Osoti et al., “Low frequency of Plasmodium falciparum hrp2/3 deletions from symptomatic infections at a primary healthcare facility in Kilifi, Kenya,” Frontiers in Epidemiology, vol. 3, pp. 1–9, 2023.
View at: Google Scholar
M. M. Kocharekar, S. S. Sarkar, and D. Dasgupta, “Comparative study of modified quantitative buffy coat and two rapid tests in comparison with peripheral blood smear in malaria diagnosis in Mumbai, India,” Journal of Parasitology Research, vol. 2014, Article ID 194651, 7 pages, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Kochareka, S. Sarkar, D. Dasgupta, and U. Aigal, “A preliminary comparative report of quantitative buffy coat and modified quantitative buffy coat with peripheral blood smear in malaria diagnosis,” Pathogens and Global Health, vol. 106, no. 6, pp. 335–339, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. H. Ahmed and J. C. Samantaray, “Quantitative buffy coat analysis-an effective tool for diagnosing blood parasites,” Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, vol. 8, no. 4, p. DH01, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Slater, S. Ashraf, O. Zahid et al., “Current methods for the detection of Plasmodium parasite species infecting humans,” Current Research in Parasitology & Vector-Borne Diseases, vol. 2, Article ID 100086, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. A. Mangold, R. U. Manson, E. S. C. Koay et al., “Real-time PCR for detection and identification of Plasmodium spp,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 2435–2440, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, “Choosing a drug to prevent malaria,” 2023, https://www.cdc.gov/malaria/travelers/drugs.html.
View at: Google Scholar
D. G. Lalloo and D. R. Hill, “Preventing malaria in travellers,” BMJ, vol. 336, no. 7657, pp. 1362–1366, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Pryce, N. Medley, and L. Choi, “Indoor residual spraying for preventing malaria in communities using insecticide-treated nets,” Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, vol. 1, no. 1, Article ID Cd012688, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. M. Birkholtz, R. Bornman, W. Focke, C. Mutero, and C. de Jager, “Sustainable malaria control: transdisciplinary approaches for translational applications,” Malaria Journal, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 431, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Rasmussen, P. Alonso, and P. Ringwald, “Current and emerging strategies to combat antimalarial resistance,” Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 353–372, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
World Health Organization, “Drug resistance in malaria,” 2001, https://www.cdc.gov/malaria/resources/pdf/drug_resistance/bloland_who2001.pdf.
View at: Google Scholar
World Health Organization, “Tackling emerging antimalarial drug resistance in Africa,” 2022, https://www.who.int/news/item/18-11-2022-tackling-emerging-antimalarial-drug-resistance-in-africa.
View at: Google Scholar
J. G. Breman, M. S. Alilio, and A. Mills, The Intolerable Burden of Malaria II: What's New, What's Needed: Supplement to Volume 71(2) of the American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, Northbrook, IL, USA, 2004.
A. M. Thu, A. P. Phyo, J. Landier, D. M. Parker, and F. H. Nosten, “Combating multidrug-resistant Plasmodium falciparum malaria,” FEBS Journal, vol. 284, no. 16, pp. 2569–2578, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. L. Gatton, L. B. Martin, and Q. Cheng, “Evolution of resistance to sulfadoxine pyrimethamine in Plasmodium falciparum,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 48, no. 6, pp. 2116–2123, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. DeVos and N. Dunn, Malaria Prophylaxis, StatPearls Publishing, Petersburg, Fl, USA, 2023.
N. S. Tibon, C. H. Ng, and S. L. Cheong, “Current progress in antimalarial pharmacotherapy and multi-target drug discovery,” European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 188, Article ID 111983, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Herraiz, H. Guillén, D. González-Peña, and V. J. Arán, “Antimalarial quinoline drugs inhibit β-hematin and increase free hemin catalyzing peroxidative reactions and inhibition of cysteine proteases,” Scientific Reports, vol. 9, no. 1, Article ID 15398, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Nzila, “The past, present and future of antifolates in the treatment of Plasmodium falciparum infection,” Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, vol. 57, no. 6, pp. 1043–1054, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Gaillard, M. Madamet, and B. Pradines, “Tetracyclines in malaria,” Malaria Journal, vol. 14, no. 1, p. 445, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
World Health Organization, Guidelines for the treatment of malaria, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 2015.
D. B. Rossiter, M. Blockman, and K. I. Karen, South African Medicines Formulary, University of Cape Town Division of Clinical Pharmacology South African Medical Association Health Medical Publishing, Pretoria, South Africa, 2020.
L. Baker, “The role of pharmacists in travel medicine in South Africa,” Pharmacy, vol. 6, no. 3, p. 68, 2018.
View at: Google Scholar
K. Vliegenthart-Jongbloed, M. de Mendonça Melo, M. E. Wolfswinkel, R. Koelewijn, J. J. van Hellemond, and P. J. J. van Genderen, “Severity of imported malaria: protective effect of taking malaria chemoprophylaxis,” Malaria Journal, vol. 12, no. 1, p. 265, 2013.
View at: Google Scholar
U. D'Alessandro, J. Hill, J. Tarning et al., “Treatment of uncomplicated and severe malaria during pregnancy,” The Lancet Infectious Diseases, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. e133–e146, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Hanboonkunupakarn and N. J. White, “Advances and roadblocks in the treatment of malaria,” British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, vol. 88, no. 2, pp. 374–382, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Damodaran, P. Pradhan, and S. C. Pradhan, “Newer approaches to malaria control,” Tropenmedizin und Parasitologie, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 57–63, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
World Health Organization, Strategy to respond to antimalarial drug resistance in Africa, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 2020.
T. M. Belete, “Recent progress in the development of new antimalarial drugs with novel targets,” Drug Design, Development and Therapy, vol. 14, pp. 3875–3889, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Alam, M. Goyal, M. S. Iqbal et al., “Novel antimalarial drug targets: hope for new antimalarial drugs,” Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology, vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 469–489, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Winstanley, S. Ward, R. Snow, and A. Breckenridge, “Therapy of falciparum malaria in sub-saharan Africa: from molecule to policy,” Clinical Microbiology Reviews, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 612–637, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
National Institute for Communicable Diseases, “The seven steps South Africa is taking to get it closer to eliminating malaria,” 2021, https://www.nicd.ac.za/the-seven-steps-south-africa-is-taking-to-get-it-closer-to-eliminating-malaria/.
View at: Google Scholar
J. Chuma, V. Okungu, and C. Molyneux, “Barriers to prompt and effective malaria treatment among the poorest population in Kenya,” Malaria Journal, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 144, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
World Health Organization, WHO Recommends Groundbreaking Malaria Vaccine for Children at Risk, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 2021.
M. B. Laurens, “RTS,S/AS01 vaccine (Mosquirix™): an overview,” Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 480–489, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. J. Draper, B. K. Sack, C. R. King et al., “Malaria vaccines: recent advances and new horizons,” Cell Host & Microbe, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 43–56, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. B. Orok, O. Ajibaye, O. O. Aina, G. Iboma, S. Adagyo Oboshi, and B. Iwalokun, “Malaria interventions and control programes in Sub-Saharan Africa: a narrative review,” Cogent Medicine, vol. 8, no. 1, Article ID 1940639, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
World Health Organization, “The africa malaria report 2003,” 2003, https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/67869/WHO_CDS?sequence=1.
View at: Google Scholar
World Health Organization, “Global malaria programme,” 2022, https://www.who.int/teams/global-malaria-programme/prevention/vector-control.
View at: Google Scholar
M. Ediau, J. N. Babirye, N. M. Tumwesigye et al., “Community knowledge and perceptions about indoor residual spraying for malaria prevention in Soroti district, Uganda: a cross-sectional study,” Malaria Journal, vol. 12, no. 1, p. 170, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2024 Marissa Balmith et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

348

Downloads

255

Citations