Predictive Value of Nasal Nitric Oxide and Serum NOS2 Levels in the Efficacy of Subcutaneous Immunotherapy in Pediatric Patients with Allergic Rhinitis

Wen, Sihui; Cheng, Shenghao; Xie, Shaobing; Zhang, Hua; Zhang, Junyi; Wang, Fengjun; Xie, Shumin; Xie, Zhihai; Jiang, Weihong

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/1679536

Mediators of Inflammation

On this page

Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion Abbreviations Data Availability Ethical Approval Conflicts of Interest Authors’ Contributions Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Special Issue

The Role of Inflammatory Mediators in Nasal and Sinonasal Diseases

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2022 | Article ID 1679536 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/1679536

Predictive Value of Nasal Nitric Oxide and Serum NOS2 Levels in the Efficacy of Subcutaneous Immunotherapy in Pediatric Patients with Allergic Rhinitis

Sihui Wen,^1,2,3Shenghao Cheng,^1,2,3Shaobing Xie,^1,2,3Hua Zhang,^1,2,3Junyi Zhang,^1,2,3Fengjun Wang,^1,2,3Shumin Xie,^1,2,3Zhihai Xie ,^1,2,3and Weihong Jiang^1,2,3

Academic Editor: Mirella Giovarelli

Received11 Jun 2022

Accepted02 Aug 2022

Published16 Aug 2022

Abstract

Background. Subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) is an effective therapy for allergic rhinitis (AR), but some AR patients still do not benefit from it. Nasal nitric oxide (nNO) and inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS/NOS2) act important roles in AR. This study aims to explore the abilities of serum NOS2 and nNO in predicting the clinical efficacy of SCIT in AR patients. Methods. We recruited 40 healthy controls (HCs) and 120 AR patients in this study. Serum NOS2 and nNO levels were compared between the two groups. In the AR group, patients underwent and finished 1-year of SCIT, and divided into the effective and ineffective groups, and the relationships between serum NOS2 and nNO levels and efficacy of SCIT were evaluated. Results. The serum NOS2 and nNO levels were higher in AR patients than HCs. In the effective group, the serum NOS2 and nNO levels were increased than the ineffective group. ROC curves presented that a combination of serum NOS2 and nNO exhibited promising predictive ability in predicting the clinical efficacy of SCIT. Conclusions. Serum NOS2 and nNO levels were enhanced in AR patients and might affect the efficacy of SCIT. The combined use of serum NOS2 and nNO levels could be a reliable and useful method for predicting the clinical efficacy of SCIT.

1. Introduction

Allergic rhinitis (AR) is one of the most common chronic inflammatory diseases of the upper airways, which is characterized by Th2 type inflammatory disease mediated by immunoglobulin E (IgE) [1]. Recent epidemiological studies reported that the prevalence of AR in Chinese adults increased by 6.5% in the last 6 years, and the number of patients with AR continued to increase [2, 3]. Although it is not life-threatening, the classical symptoms of AR, such as nasal itching, rhinorrhea, sneezing, and nasal obstruction, exhibit negative impacts on the patient’s quality of life and work efficiency [4–6]. At present, the treatment of AR mainly includes environmental control, medications, allergen-specific immunotherapy (AIT), and surgery. Among them, AIT has been shown to be an effective treatment for IgE-mediated diseases, which is also considered to be the only treatment that can alter the natural course of AR [7, 8]. AIT can be administered either subcutaneously (SCIT) or sublingually (SLIT), and more and more evidences showed that SCIT was superior to SLIT in controlling allergic symptoms and decreasing medication consumption [9–11]. However, not all patients respond to SCIT, and the overall effectiveness rate is 52.0%-86.4% [3]. Currently, there is no available biomarker or method to predict the response to SCIT treatment. Therefore, it is necessary to find objective indicators or biomarkers which can be utilized to predict the response to SCIT in AR patients.

Inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS/NOS2) catalyzes the production of nitric oxide (NO) and plays an essential role in metabolic and inflammatory processes [12, 13]. Studies have shown that NOS2 was widely expressed in human bronchial epithelial cells, macrophages, endothelial cells, and vascular smooth muscle cells [14], and abnormal expression of NOS2 was involved in a variety of inflammatory diseases, including asthma, psoriasis, AR, and chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) [12, 15, 16]. Allergic airway inflammation can promote the hyperactivity of NOS2 and then aggravate the production of NO concentration in the airway [17]. Sakthivel and Guruvayoorappan [18] found that serum NOS2 levels were elevated in murine models of carrageenan- and formaldehyde-induced inflammation, and the concentration was significantly reduced in murine treated with extracts with anti-inflammatory effects. NO acts as a signaling molecule involved in the regulation of various physiological functions of the body, including inflammation [19–21]. Previous studies suggested that NO could promote Th2-type inflammatory responses and eosinophilic inflammation, which contributed to the pathomechanism of allergic diseases [22]. Measuring the concentration of exhaled NO is considered as a noninvasive method to identify and monitor eosinophilic airway inflammation in airway inflammatory disease [23]. Prior publications demonstrated that nasal nitric oxide (nNO) and fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) levels were associated with upper and lower airway inflammation, respectively [24, 25]. However, few studies have explored the effect of nNO as an objective indicator to reflect the efficacy of AIT in AR patients. This study aims to explore the role of serum NOS2 and nNO levels in AR and evaluate their abilities in predicting the clinical efficacy of SCIT in AR patients.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Participants and Settings

We recruited 120 AR patients and 40 age- and sex-matched healthy controls (HCs) from December 2019 to January 2020. All patients met the diagnostic criteria of AR referring to the allergic rhinitis and its impact on asthma (ARIA) guidelines [26]. The criteria for patient inclusion were listed as follows: (1) a history of allergic symptoms (nasal itching, rhinorrhea, sneezing, and nasal obstruction) for 2 years or more; (2) positive skin test results of Dermatophagoides farina (Der f) and/or Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus (Der p) (at least ++) and/or sIgE level for Der f or Der p >0.35 IU/ml; and (3) moderate-severe AR. Exclusion criteria for the patients include (1) age<18 years; (2) with other inflammatory diseases or autoimmune diseases; (3) with active asthma; (4) had a history of immunotherapy; (5) treated with antibiotics, corticosteroids, or antiallergic drugs within 4 weeks before the study; and (6) pregnant condition. Demographic and clinical information of the subjects were collected, and serum samples were collected before SCIT. In the AR group, 94 of 120 AR patients received standard SCIT for 3 years. All participants were asked to complete several questionnaires about their symptoms at baseline and during the whole schedule of SCIT.

2.2. Measurement of Serum NOS2

Five ml of fresh venous blood was collected from all subjects and stored at room temperature for 1 hour. All blood samples were centrifuged at 4°C (3000 rpm for 10 min), and supernatants were collected and stored in aliquots at -80°C for subsequent experiments.

Serum samples were thawed and centrifuged before use. Serum NOS2 levels were measured by the ELISA kit commercial (Multisciences, Hangzhou, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, the target antigen was immobilized by passive uptake on a 96-well polystyrene microtiter plate. A blocking buffer was added to saturate all unbound sites and then incubated with an antigen-specific unlabeled primary antibody. An antihuman enzyme-coupled secondary antibody was subsequently added to bind to the primary antibody. Generally, the secondary antibody is conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (HRP) and detected with an enhanced chemiluminescence substrate (ECL) [27].

2.3. Measurement of nNO

Participant held a filter with one nostril blocked, and another nostril was unblocked during the entire measurement. Every subject was requested to inhale air through the filter and then emit a whistle for at least 10 seconds without stopping. Before the examination, smoking and strenuous exercise were unallowed for at least one hour, and intranasal corticosteroids or oral antiallergy medication should be suspended for more than 3 days. The nNO levels were measured by the Nano Coulomb Breath Analyzer (Sunvou-CA2122).

2.4. Immunotherapy

SCIT was conducted as previously described [28]. All AR patients received Novo-Helisen Depot (NHD) allergen extracts (Allergopharma, Reinbek, Germany) from Der f and Der p at a 1 : 1 ratio. According to the manufacturer’s instructions, SCIT consists of two phases: initial treatment phase and maintenance treatment phase. To achieve long-term efficacy, a treatment course of 3 years is recommended. The initial treatment phase started with the minimum dose of low concentration NHD NO.1 and gradually increased to the maximum dose of high concentration NHD NO.3. The injection interval was generally 7-14 days. For NO.1 and NO.2, the doses were increased from 0.1, 0.2, 0.4, to 0.8 ml. For NO.3, the dose was increased from 0.1, 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, to 1.0 ml. In the maintenance treatment phase, patients were injected with 1.0 ml of NO.3 with an injection interval of 4 to 6 weeks. SCIT was conducted in the outpatient department under the guidance of allergy experts, and all patients were observed for >30 minutes before leaving. All adverse reactions were recorded throughout the whole treatment.

2.5. Clinical Efficacy Assessment

After 1-year follow-up, the symptoms and medication consumption were recorded throughout the course of treatment. The early clinical efficacy of SCIT was assessed based on the improvement of clinical symptoms and the reduction of medication consumption after 1 year of treatment. The symptoms of all AR patients were scored using the widely accepted total nasal symptom score (TNSS) and visual analogue score (VAS). The sum of medication consumption in the previous week was defined as the medication score (MS), which was recorded according to the recommendations of the World Allergy Organization: 1, 2, and 3 points for oral or intranasal antihistamines, intranasal glucocorticoids, and oral glucocorticoids, respectively [29]. The sum of total nasal symptom score and final MS was defined as nasal symptom and medication score (SMS). A reduction of SMS by at least 30% compared to baseline level was defined as effective SCIT; otherwise, the SCIT was considered to be ineffective [28].

2.6. Statistical Analysis

Numerical variables were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD), Student’s t-test was used for normally distributed variables, and the Mann–Whitney U test was applied for nonnormally distributed variables. Categorical data were expressed as frequencies and percentages, and the difference was compared using the Chi-square test. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were performed to evaluate the potential value of serum NOS2 combined with nNO in predicting the clinical efficacy of SCIT. Bilateral values below 0.05 were considered statistically significant. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 19.0 statistical software (IBM, Chicago, IL, USA).

3. Results

3.1. The Baseline Data for All Subjects

A total of 160 individuals were included in this study, including120 cases in the AR group, and 40 cases in the HC group. As shown in Table 1, then, NO levels, serum NOS2 concentrations and allergic comorbidities rates are significantly higher in the AR group than the HC group, and no statistical differences were observed in other clinical parameters, including gender, age BMI, and alcohol consumption between two groups. Among the AR group, a total of 94 patients received SCIT, and 26 patients preferred other treatment options. Table 2 summarizes the characteristics of these 94 patients, including symptom scores and clinical variables.

3.2. Serum NOS2 and nNO Level in the AR Patients and their Relationships with Clinical Variables

Serum NOS2 and nNO levels were increased in the AR group compared to the HC group (, Figure 1). However, the serum concentrations of NOS2 were not significantly different in the AR subgroups (, Figures 2(a) and 2(b)). The nNO levels were significantly higher in the AR with AS subgroup than without AS subgroup (), but no statistically different in the AR with AC and without AC subgroups in Figures 2(c) and 2(d) (). To further explore the relationship between serum NOS2 and nNO levels and clinical variables, the correlation analysis was performed on the associations among age, BMI, disease duration, baseline VAS, and baseline TNSS. The results showed that serum NOS2 and nNO were inversely correlated with age and BMI, respectively, and serum NOS2 and nNO were positively correlated with each other (Table 3).

(a)

(b)

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

Figure 2

Expression levels of serum NOS2 and nNO in the AR subgroup. (a) Serum NOS2 levels were not different in AR with AS group and AR without AS group. (b) Similarly, serum concentrations of NOS2 were also not significantly different in the AR with AC group and AR without AC group. (c) nNO levels were significantly elevated in AR with AS group compared to the AR without AS group. (d) nNO levels were not significantly different in the AR with AC group and AR without AC group. NOS2: inducible nitric oxide synthase; nNO: nasal nitric oxide; AR: allergic rhinitis; AS: allergic asthma; AC: allergic conjunctivitis; ns: no significance, .

3.3. Variation of Serum NOS2 and nNO and the Connection with the Efficacy of SCIT

Depending on the patients’ response to SCIT, the AR group was further divided into the effective and the ineffective groups (Table 4). The results showed that the levels of serum NOS2 and nNO were distinctly upregulated in the effective group in comparison with the ineffective group (Figures 3(a) and 3(b)). For further investigation of the predictive value of serum NOS2 and nNO for the early efficacy of SCIT, ROC curves were performed. The ROC curve analysis revealed that the areas under the curve (AUC) were 0.759 (0.645-0.873) and 0.716 (0.596-0.837) of serum NOS2 and nNO, respectively. Interestingly, the AUC value was increased to 0.787 when combining serum NOS2 and nNO in predicting the efficacy (Figure 4). The detailed data are listed in Table 5.

(a)

(b)

4. Discussion

In the present study, our results indicated that levels of nNO and serum NOS2 were significantly higher in AR patients in comparison with the HCs, and their levels were clearly increased in the effective group than the ineffective group who were treated with SCIT. The ROC curve analysis revealed that the combination of these two indicators exhibited better predictive abilities than each single indicator. These results showed that serum NOS2 and nNO might affect the efficacy of SCIT, and the combined use of them might serve as a reliable and useful method for predicting the clinical outcome of SCIT in AR patients.

NOS2 was reported to be expressed in the nasal epithelial cell and associated with the production of NO, which contributed to aggravating eosinophilic inflammation [30]. Previous studies showed that elevated NOS2 expressions could enhance the release of NO, which was closely involved in vasodilation, microvascular leakage, smooth muscle relaxation, and abnormal glandular secretion [31]. As a common upper airway inflammatory disease, AR is typically characterized by a predominant Th2 response and eosinophil infiltration in nasal mucosa [32–34]. NO was proven to be pivotal in modulating the production of Th2 cytokines which were responsible for the migration of eosinophils into the airway mucosa [35]. Prior publications demonstrated that nNO could be used as a reproducible and noninvasive biomarker in respiratory diseases [36, 37]. Lv et al.’s study discovered that the measurement of nNO was useful for the early diagnosis of eosinophilic CRS with nasal polyps [38]. Our study indicated that the levels of both nNO and serum NOS2 were significantly higher in AR patients in comparison with the HCs, which was consistent with previous studies [39]. Moreover, we also found that serum NOS2 and nNO levels were negatively correlated with age and BMI, respectively (, ; , ). Accordingly, NOS2 was derived from airway epithelial cells which were gradually deteriorated with age [40]. Meanwhile, Holguin F et al. found that obesity was associated with lower plasma L-arginine/asymmetric dimethyl arginine (ADMA), which explained why exhaled NO was inversely related to BMI [41]. Given that, we suggested that NOS2 and nNO played crucial roles in the pathophysiology of AR, and age and BMI might be potential factors associated with the NOS2 and nNO levels.

SCIT was demonstrated to be an effective treatment for AR, but a certain proportion of patients still responds poorly to this therapy [42, 43]. The main aims of SCIT were to establish peripheral immune tolerance to allergens, suppress allergic responses, the balance of Th1/Th2 response, and induce IgG4 production [44]. Recent studies have found that serum-specific IgE/total IgE ratio and serum-specific IgE at baseline were considered to be potential predictors for treatment outcome [45, 46]. Parisi et al. [23] observed that nNO might serve as a predictive indicator of short-term SCIT efficacy in children with AR. In addition, Lee and his colleagues indicated that nNO could be a long-term biomarker for monitoring and prognostic of mucosal health in CRS [47]. However, the application of these biomarkers in clinical practice remains controversial because of discordant sensitivity and specificity. In this study, our results demonstrated that serum NOS2 and nNO levels were significantly elevated in the effective group than the ineffective group. Besides, ROC curves analysis showed that serum NOS2 and nNO exhibited potential abilities in predicting SCIT efficacy, and combined these two indicators showed significantly greater predictive value. Macrophages, as innate immune cells, are involved in the maintenance of allergen tolerance [48]. Previous studies confirmed that the production of IgG4 was triggered in vitro by M2b-like suppressor macrophages after AIT, and these macrophages could induce the production of IL-10, which suppressed the Th2 cell responses [48, 49]. Furthermore, macrophage subtypes can be interconverted during the process of reprogramming inflammatory environments and developing immune tolerance. A prior publication revealed that M1 macrophage polarization was observed in the early stage after viral infection and then gradually transformed to M2b macrophage polarization [50]. Taken together, we speculated that M1 macrophages were gradually transformed into M2b macrophages during SCIT, which were involved in the therapeutic mechanisms of SCIT and contributed to immune tolerance. On the other hand, nNO expression levels could reflect Th2 cytokine-induced type 2 inflammation and the number of eosinophils in the airways [51]. SCIT was identified to be effective by suppressing eosinophilic inflammation and promoting a deviation of Th2-type inflammatory response toward Th1. Therefore, nNO as an indicator associated with eosinophilic inflammation might reflect the efficacy of SCIT [51, 52]. Given that, we can infer that NOS2, an M1 macrophage marker, its concentrations, and nNO levels before SCIT might show synergistic effects and exhibit greater predictive values for the efficacy of SCIT. But the underlying mechanisms need to be further investigated.

The present study has several limitations. Firstly, the follow-up period was only 1 year, and the therapeutic evaluation might be biased and not representative. Secondly, the sample size was relatively small, and the participants were recruited from a single medical center, which might increase the risk of selection bias. Therefore, further investigation with a larger population and longer follow-up time was necessary to confirm the results of this study.

In conclusion, this study had certain strengths in terms of novel design. Our results proved that serum NOS2 and nNO were not only involved in the pathological process of AR but also affected the efficacy of SCIT. Combined use of serum NOS2 and nNO levels seems to be a reliable and useful method for predicting the clinical efficacy of SCIT in AR patients.

Abbreviations

AR:	Allergic rhinitis
Th:	T cell helper
IgE:	Immunoglobulin E
AIT:	Allergen-specific immunotherapy
SCIT:	Subcutaneously immunotherapy
SLIT:	Sublingually immunotherapy
iNOS/NOS2:	Inducible nitric oxide synthase
NO:	Nitric oxide
CRS:	Chronic rhinosinusitis
nNO:	Nasal nitric oxide
FeNO:	Fractional exhaled nitric oxide
HCs:	Healthy controls
ARIA:	Allergic rhinitis and its impact on asthma
Der f:	Dermatophagoides farina
Der p:	Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus
ELISA:	Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
HRP:	Horseradish peroxidase
ECL:	Enhanced chemiluminescence substrate
NHD:	Novo-Helisen depot
TNSS:	Total nasal symptom score
VAS:	Visual analogue score
MS:	Medication score
SMS:	Symptom and medication score
SD:	Standard deviation
ROC:	Receiver operating characteristic
BMI:	Body mass index
AS:	Allergic asthma
AC:	Allergic conjunctivitis
AUC:	Area under the curve
CI:	Confidence interval
IgG4:	Immunoglobulin G4.

Data Availability

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Ethical Approval

The present study was approved by the ethical committee of Xiangya Hospital of Central South University. We obtained the informed consent of all participants in accordance with ethical codes and regulations for human subject research [53].

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have declared that there is no competing interest about this study.

Authors’ Contributions

Sihui Wen and Shenghao Cheng contributed equally to this work. All authors made a significant contribution to the work reported, whether that is in the conception, study design, execution, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation, or in all these areas; took part in drafting, revising, or critically reviewing the article; gave final approval of the version to be published; have agreed on the journal to which the article has been submitted; and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 82171118, No. 81800917, and No. 81873695) and the Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province (No. 2020JJ4910).

References

N. T. Orban, M. R. Jacobson, K. T. Nouri-Aria, S. R. Durham, and A. O. Eifan, “Repetitive nasal allergen challenge in allergic rhinitis: priming and Th2-type inflammation but no evidence of remodelling,” Clinical and Experimental Allergy, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 329–338, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Zhang, F. Lan, and L. Zhang, “Advances and highlights in allergic rhinitis,” Allergy, vol. 76, no. 11, pp. 3383–3389, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Liu, H. Lu, X. Feng, L. Hu, J. Wang, and H. Yu, “Predictive methods for efficacy of house dust mite subcutaneous immunotherapy in allergic rhinitis patients: a prospective study in a Chinese population,” International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 314–319, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. A. Abd El-Fattah, N. A. H. Sadik, O. G. Shaker, and K. A. Mohamed, “Single nucleotide polymorphism in SMAD7 and CHI3L1 and colorectal cancer risk,” Mediators of Inflammation, vol. 2018, Article ID 9853192, 23 pages, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Bousquet, P. W. Hellings, I. Agache et al., “Allergic rhinitis and its impact on asthma (ARIA) phase 4 (2018): change management in allergic rhinitis and asthma multimorbidity using mobile technology,” The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, vol. 143, no. 3, pp. 864–879, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Liu, T. Wang, J. Xia et al., “Cholinergic neuron-like D-U87 cells promote polarization of allergic rhinitis T-helper 2 cells,” International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 233–242, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Y. Lam, V. Tergaonkar, and K. S. Ahn, “Mechanisms of allergen-specific immunotherapy for allergic rhinitis and food allergies,” Bioscience Reports, vol. 40, no. 4, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Cuppari, S. Leonardi, S. Manti et al., “Allergen immunotherapy, routes of administration and cytokine networks: an update,” Immunotherapy, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 775–786, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Dretzke, A. Meadows, N. Novielli, A. Huissoon, A. Fry-Smith, and C. Meads, “Subcutaneous and sublingual immunotherapy for seasonal allergic rhinitis: a systematic review and indirect comparison,” The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, vol. 131, no. 5, pp. 1361–1366, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. R. Durham and M. Penagos, “Sublingual or subcutaneous immunotherapy for allergic rhinitis?” The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, vol. 137, no. 2, pp. 339–49.e10, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
O. Pfaar, H. Lou, Y. Zhang, L. Klimek, and L. Zhang, “Recent developments and highlights in allergen immunotherapy,” Allergy, vol. 73, no. 12, pp. 2274–2289, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Garzorz and K. Eyerich, “NOS2 and CCL27: clinical implications for psoriasis and eczema diagnosis and management,” Expert Review of Clinical Immunology, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 167–169, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. M. Abu-Soud, C. Wu, D. K. Ghosh, and D. J. Stuehr, “Stopped-flow analysis of CO and NO binding to inducible nitric oxide synthase,” Biochemistry, vol. 37, no. 11, pp. 3777–3786, 1998.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. V. Pechkovsky, G. Zissel, T. Goldmann et al., “Pattern of NOS2 and NOS3 mRNA expression in human A549 cells and primary cultured AEC II,” American Journal of Physiology. Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology, vol. 282, no. 4, pp. L684–L692, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Dahgam, F. Nyberg, L. Modig, A. T. Naluai, and A. C. Olin, “Single nucleotide polymorphisms in the NOS2 and NOS3 genes are associated with exhaled nitric oxide,” Journal of Medical Genetics, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 200–205, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Kawasumi, S. Takeno, C. Ishikawa et al., “The functional diversity of nitric oxide synthase isoforms in human nose and paranasal sinuses: contrasting pathophysiological aspects in nasal allergy and chronic rhinosinusitis,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 22, no. 14, p. 7561, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Sutiratanachai, W. Kanchongkittiphon, N. Klangkalya, W. Jotikasthira, P. Kiewngam, and W. Manuyakorn, “Airway nitric oxide in children with HDM-induced allergic rhinitis,” American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 360–366, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. M. Sakthivel and C. Guruvayoorappan, “Acacia ferruginea inhibits inflammation by regulating inflammatory iNOS and COX-2,” Journal of Immunotoxicology, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 127–135, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. N. Möller, N. Rios, M. Trujillo, R. Radi, A. Denicola, and B. Alvarez, “JBC reviews: analysis of NO^•-derived oxidants,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 294, no. 40, pp. 14776–14802, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. I. Galkina, E. A. Golenkina, G. M. Viryasova, Y. M. Romanova, and G. F. Sud'ina, “Nitric oxide in life and death of neutrophils,” Current Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 26, no. 31, pp. 5764–5780, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Sawa, H. Arimoto, and T. Akaike, “Regulation of redox signaling involving chemical conjugation of protein thiols by nitric oxide and electrophiles,” Bioconjugate Chemistry, vol. 21, no. 7, pp. 1121–1129, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Leonardi, C. Cuppari, A. Lanzafame et al., “Exhaled BREATH temperature in asthmatic children,” Journal of Biological Regulators and Homeostatic Agents, vol. 29, 2 Suppl 1, pp. 47–54, 2015.
View at: Google Scholar
G. F. Parisi, S. Manti, M. Papale et al., “Nasal nitric oxide and nasal cytology as predictive markers of short-term sublingual allergen-specific immunotherapy efficacy in children with allergic rhinitis,” American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 323–329, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Y. Luo, H. A. Chen, J. Ma et al., “Clinical application of fractional exhaled nitric oxide and nasal nitric oxide levels for the assess eosinophilic inflammation of allergic rhinitis among children,” Translational Pediatrics, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 746–753, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Licari, S. Manti, R. Castagnoli, S. Leonardi, and G. L. Marseglia, “Measuring inflammation in paediatric severe asthma: biomarkers in clinical practice,” Breathe (Sheffield, England), vol. 16, no. 1, article 190301, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. L. Brożek, J. Bousquet, I. Agache et al., “Allergic rhinitis and its impact on asthma (ARIA) guidelines—2016 revision,” The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, vol. 140, no. 4, pp. 950–958, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. V. Lin, “Indirect ELISA,” Methods in Molecular Biology, vol. 1318, pp. 51–59, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Xie, R. Fan, Q. Tang et al., “Identification of robust biomarkers for early predicting efficacy of subcutaneous immunotherapy in children with house dust mite-induced allergic rhinitis by multiple cytokine profiling,” Frontiers in Immunology, vol. 12, article 805404, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
O. Pfaar, P. Demoly, R. Gerth van Wijk et al., “Recommendations for the standardization of clinical outcomes used in allergen immunotherapy trials for allergic rhinoconjunctivitis: an EAACI position paper,” Allergy, vol. 69, no. 7, pp. 854–867, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Hou, H. Lou, Y. Wang et al., “Nasal ventilation is an important factor in evaluating the diagnostic value of nasal nitric oxide in allergic rhinitis,” International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 686–694, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Li, Y. Wang, and Q. Zhang, “Expression of cell adhesion molecule and nitric oxide synthase in nasal mucosa in allergic rhinitis,” Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi, vol. 20, no. 7, pp. 315–318, 2006.
View at: Google Scholar
M. Folci, G. Ramponi, I. Arcari, A. Zumbo, and E. Brunetta, “Eosinophils as major player in type 2 inflammation: autoimmunity and beyond,” Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol. 1347, pp. 197–219, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. M. Wheatley and A. Togias, “Allergic rhinitis,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 372, no. 5, pp. 456–463, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. A. Jacobsen, K. R. Zellner, D. Colbert, N. A. Lee, and J. J. Lee, “Eosinophils regulate dendritic cells and Th2 pulmonary immune responses following allergen provocation,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 187, no. 11, pp. 6059–6068, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. H. Pelaquini, L. D. Guimarães, L. R. Benetti et al., “Role of the Mac-1 and VLA-4 integrins, and concomitant Th2-cytokine production, in nitric oxide modulated eosinophil migration from bone marrow to lungs in allergic mice,” International Immunopharmacology, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 204–211, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. A. Dweik, P. B. Boggs, S. C. Erzurum et al., “An official ATS clinical practice guideline: interpretation of exhaled nitric oxide levels (FENO) for clinical applications,” American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, vol. 184, no. 5, pp. 602–615, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. American Thoracic and R. S. European, “ATS/ERS recommendations for standardized procedures for the online and offline measurement of exhaled lower respiratory nitric oxide and nasal nitric oxide, 2005,” American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, vol. 171, no. 8, pp. 912–930, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Lv, P. Q. Liu, R. Xiang et al., “Predictive and diagnostic value of nasal nitric oxide in eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps,” International Archives of Allergy and Immunology, vol. 181, no. 11, pp. 853–861, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Gupta, N. Goel, and R. Kumar, “Correlation of exhaled nitric oxide, nasal nitric oxide and atopic status: a cross-sectional study in bronchial asthma and allergic rhinitis,” Lung India, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 342–347, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. C. Ho, K. N. Chan, W. H. Hu et al., “The effect of aging on nasal mucociliary clearance, beat frequency, and ultrastructure of respiratory cilia,” American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine, vol. 163, no. 4, pp. 983–988, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Holguin, S. A. A. Comhair, S. L. Hazen et al., “An association between L-arginine/asymmetric dimethyl arginine balance, obesity, and the age of asthma onset phenotype,” American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine, vol. 187, no. 2, pp. 153–159, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. A. Calderon, M. Penagos, V. A. Carr et al., “Allergen injection immunotherapy for perennial allergic rhinitis: Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis,” Allergy, vol. 68, pp. 643-644, 2013.
View at: Google Scholar
W. Liu, Q. Zeng, C. He et al., “Compliance, efficacy, and safety of subcutaneous and sublingual immunotherapy in children with allergic rhinitis,” Pediatric Allergy and Immunology, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 86–91, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
O. Palomares, M. Akdis, M. Martin-Fontecha, and C. A. Akdis, “Mechanisms of immune regulation in allergic diseases: the role of regulatory T and B cells,” Immunological Reviews, vol. 278, no. 1, pp. 219–236, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. H. Lee, S. C. Kim, H. Choi et al., “Subcutaneous immunotherapy for allergic asthma in a single center of Korea: efficacy, safety, and clinical response predictors,” Journal of Korean Medical Science, vol. 32, no. 7, pp. 1124–1130, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Ciprandi and M. Silvestri, “Serum specific IgE: a biomarker of response to allergen immunotherapy,” Journal of Investigational Allergology & Clinical Immunology, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 35–39, 2014.
View at: Google Scholar
D. J. Lee, J. Yip, and J. M. Lee, “Nasal nitric oxide as a long-term monitoring and prognostic biomarker of mucosal health in chronic rhinosinusitis,” International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology, vol. 10, no. 8, pp. 971–977, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Bianchini, F. Roth-Walter, A. Ohradanova-Repic et al., “IgG4 drives M2a macrophages to a regulatory M2b-like phenotype: potential implication in immune tolerance,” Allergy, vol. 74, no. 3, pp. 483–494, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. M. Coomes, Y. Kannan, V. S. Pelly et al., “CD4⁺ Th2 cells are directly regulated by IL-10 during allergic airway inflammation,” Mucosal Immunology, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 150–161, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Zhao, J. Dai, X. Xiao et al., “PI3K/Akt signaling pathway modulates influenza virus induced mouse alveolar macrophage polarization to M1/M2b,” PLoS One, vol. 9, no. 8, article e104506, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Chibana, J. B. Trudeau, A. T. Mustovitch et al., “IL-13 induced increases in nitrite levels are primarily driven by increases in inducible nitric oxide synthase as compared with effects on arginases in human primary bronchial epithelial cells,” Clinical and Experimental Allergy, vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 936–946, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. H. Shamji, J. A. Layhadi, H. Sharif, M. Penagos, and S. R. Durham, “Immunological responses and biomarkers for allergen-specific immunotherapy against inhaled allergens,” The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. In Practice, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 1769–1778, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Manti and A. Licari, “How to obtain informed consent for research,” Breathe (Sheffield, England), vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 145–152, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2022 Sihui Wen et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

294

Downloads

391

Citations